ATI and ABX Merging

[FastHap]

I guess you guys have figured out how to get ahead in the cargo door and floor line as well.Usually takes a long time to get one finished much less 19 or 12 or whatever the number is.

ABX Air has a very special working relationship with BEDEK Aviation group http://www.iai.co.il/Bedek.aspx?FolderID=17562&lang=en , a subsidiary of Israel Aircraft Industries Ltd.. They have run as many as 4 simultaneous conversion lines for ABX in the recent past. ATSG has many conversion slots that are reserved and awaiting aircraft. As mentioned the first PC (Package Container, cargo door deficient) airplane leaves for Israel, and conversion for cargo door, this month. The initial STC is expected to take around a year. ATSG has already funded this project. Subsequent modifications of PC aircraft will take about 90 days.

 

[FastHap]

Yes, but will you still be opposed to merging the lists when ABX starts getting contracts to do the BAX/Schenker flying?

I think the point that Penguin is trying to make is that the owners of these three companies have already joined forces to work against you, the employees of all three airlines.

Ding! Ding! Ding! At least somebody gets it.

 

[727Niteflyer]

I think the only way an ABX aircraft ends up in toledo is for a charter or to fill in for a broken 8 or 72. I think ATSG is getting smarter about utilizing resources. I think the days of seeing the murray dc8 on the ramp are over. I think they are getting smarter at keeping the money all in the company (chartering abx for extra freight or a broken aircraft). Notice I begin with I think on every sentence, because nobody really knows. Prior to this whole ATSG deal though it was told to us that bax has no desire to run 76s or 75s. maybe that will change with the price of oil, but their still doesnt seem to be any urgency to change from that thinking. Bax seems very content with the DC8s and 72s. In fact we are suppose to be getting more. So far our 75s are gonna end with 2, which we were told all along. Second one is suppose to be here by the end of the year. If they find contracts for 75s Im sure we will get more. If they find work for ATI Im sure they will do it. And Im sure that ABX will still fly doing charters, whether its 50 aircraft 30 or 10. They will find work and ATSG probably will make money despite everyones feelings.

I feel bad for everyone on here thats going to have problems in the future. I found myself out of work 4 times myself. But at the same time if I was losing my job or bax was doing this to ATI and Cappy I know none of the "biggger" companys would be crying about me losing my job. Remember what was said to the cat people when they were losing their jobs ? I remember quotes like "your losing your job get over it", "why should UPS give anyone preferential interviews".

This sucks for everyone. Every time their is consolidation, merging, buying out, someone and their family gets hurt. Whether its ABX, USAir, Challenge, Emery, or even CAT.

 

[b707guy]

Air Transport International LLC and Capitol Cargo International Airlines "own" no aircraft, all of the planes they fly are "owned" by Cargo Aircraft Management, Inc. (CAM).

ABX Air on the the other hand owns all of it's aircraft except five that are on bank leases from Wells Fargo, etc., and apparently N714AX owned by CAM.

At one time, we owned many of our aircraft. Most of the rest were owned by Aero Leasing, and there may have been a few others owned by someone else along the way. Around the time CHI bought us, all of our aircraft one by one were bought by some mysterious entity called DC-8 Aircraft One and DC-8 Aircraft Two, or something like that, and although I haven't researched it, I believe both of those "companies" are under CAM such that CAM and ultimately ATSG now own all of our aircraft. The five 767s originally slated for us had CX tail numbers, which was a carry over from our old ICX days and which were on aircraft that we owned. Now those same 767s have a CAM-owned registration. It wouldn't surprise me one bit to see all of ABX's owned aircraft to be bought by CAM or "767 Aircraft One", etc, or at least the aircraft that will be kept.

 

[fob727]

The instant you rolled on your hostages, the company knew it was safe to roll on you. Which is what they did. The company saved a half-million dollars a year on 2 Senior DC-8 Captains they sure-as-he11 didn't need, and you got to buy some new chrome doo-dads for your motorcycle.

My kind of hero.

In 1998, the chairman of your negotiating committee brought you an industry-leading contract with a no-furlough clause. This time, thanks to you and guys like you, the company knew they didn't have to be so generous. In fact, the proposal was so full of holes in scope and furlough protection that the same individual who led the negotiations for the '98 contract wouldn't even present this one to the pilots. Of course, being a better talker than a listener, you assumed that the company was going to re-fleet with 757/767 aircraft, and that only the S/O's and a few junior F/O's would be furloughed. ("While we're at it, we'll throw them under the bus too!") You thought your seat was safe, and to he11 with the hostages, and the guys on the bottom third of the seniority list.

You were wrong. Had you protected your flanks, you wouldn't be in the position you're in right now.

Whoops! There goes the doo-dads, AND the motorcycle.

As for the rest, most of the items you list as "facts" seem to be your opinions, of which you have no shortage. The problem is, you're intolerant to the point of beligerence with anybody who doesn't share yours, which is why I never liked flying with you.

Of course, that's just my "opinion."

Now, can we all get back to the topic?

Danny-boy....you're full of sh#t!

 

[727Niteflyer]

prior to CHI being formed, all of our airplanes were owned by capital cargo or by the investors of capital and leased to capital cargo. After the pegasus deal cam was formed and all the aircraft were reregistered to 727 1 or something like that. Than it was discovered a company called 767 aircraft 1 was formed with the same address as capitalcargo. Thats how we found out we officially owned 5 767s.

Than of course cam was formed, than chi and etc..

It wouldnt surprise me if ABX isnt going to directly own their aircraft in the future. Im sure cam will take custody of the aircraft like they have all the aircraft. this gives ATSG the ability to do with what they please a little easier.

CAM is the aircraft management, buying and direct owner of all the aircraft for ATSG.

CAM will assimilate all ABX aircraft. Resistance is futile.

 

[penguin22]

Air Transport International LLC and Capitol Cargo International Airlines "own" no aircraft, all of the planes they fly are "owned" by Cargo Aircraft Management, Inc. (CAM).

ABX Air on the the other hand owns all of it's aircraft except five that are on bank leases from Wells Fargo, etc., and apparently N714AX owned by CAM.

OK so think of it another way. Career expectations.

ATI and Cappy already had those 767s and 757s purchased for them before ABX Holdings came along and bought CHI. (somebody correct me if I'm wrong here) And ATI and Cappy pilots always had the expectations to end up flying them.

Think how you would react if an -AX tail number ended up being flown by one of the other guys. Pretty much the same reaction I'd have, I suspect.

The quickest way to get all 3 pilots groups at war with one another is to suggest they may not end up flying what they consider as "their" airplanes. Let's not play into Joe's hand here.

 

[727flier]

I agree with you, but we have to have our unions working together to make sure this doesn't happen. I am sure they have spoken with each other on this issue. Teamsters and ALPA have seen this before. This is (if I'm not mistaken) how Atlas and Polar operated at first. They were both ALPA so I don't know if it's different with two labor unions.

 

[727Niteflyer]

so I guess if ATSG were to move all of cappys 72s over to ABX the ABX pilots would stand up and say they are flying them ?

my second question is, if ATI and Cappy were planning on getting 75s and 76s prior to any of this happening, and lets say ABX through no fault of thier own is going to be downsized from 50 76s to 30 76s, and lets say 10 of the 76s that ABX doesnt have work for are going to be shifted to ATI for thier military charters or to replace some of the dc8s this is a problem ?

 

[shooter]

my second question is, if ATI and Cappy were planning on getting 75s and 76s prior to any of this happening, and lets say ABX through no fault of thier own is going to be downsized from 50 76s to 30 76s, and lets say 10 of the 76s that ABX doesnt have work for are going to be shifted to ATI for thier military charters or to replace some of the dc8s this is a problem ?

If all 3 airlines become 1, that question would prove moot, right? As far as CAM owning the aircraft and leasing them back, that is going to happen no matter what you guys decide you want to do. Nothing better than cutting a profit from your own work, for doing nothing more than paying yourself for your own property. Reduce tax liability on one unit and keep more money "in house".