Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Is AT or SWA hiring?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Beginning 2014 will start to see some growth again due to DAL/Wright amendment going away.
Someone correct me if I am wrong, but SWA isn't gaining many extra gates with the new terminal at Love. I believe most of the ASM growth at Dallas Love in 2014 and beyond will be acheived by replacing 137/143 seat aircraft with 175 seat aircraft on routes that can justify the larger shell size (essentially same number of departures).
 
Someone correct me if I am wrong, but SWA isn't gaining many extra gates with the new terminal at Love. I believe most of the ASM growth at Dallas Love in 2014 and beyond will be acheived by replacing 137/143 seat aircraft with 175 seat aircraft on routes that can justify the larger shell size (essentially same number of departures).

Found another forum where a similar topic was discussed a year ago. Interesting discussion;

http://www.city-data.com/forum/dallas/1194828-dallas-fellow-texans-can-you-believe-4.html
 
In fairness to the general, I did happen upon our domicile chief conducting an exit interview with an RSW FO leaving for Delta. I won't argue the wisdom, because none of us really knows, but I will concur that there are some very staggering retirement numbers at DL and elsewhere. I can see why it would be attractive. Throw in personal things, like domicile choices and equipment preferences, and we will certainly have some leave for their own reasons.

2300 of them, no.

And I think the word you keep looking for General, is STAGNANT.
 
I have to agree with GL. I see no bait in his posts. If I was a junior FO, especially on the AT side, living in the Atlanta area and looking at a west coast commute for several years, you're darn straight I'd be looking at Delta.
Cold hard facts is we are looking at 15+ year upgrades at this point. I would not blame any FO for making the jump.

There was a downgraded AT CA in my interview group at Spirit. I am sure they would/will leave for DAl/UAL as well. It seemed life is not very good for the AirTran guys?
 
There are guys leaving AT but there will not be 2300. Morale isn't too good over here and before the OSW crowd jumps in with "you should be thankful you have a job with a great company", "98% strike vote" etc the FACT of the matter is that morale is low. You cannot change a person's bidding power, family QOL, vacation bidding power (to name just a few) in a negative way and expect that person to be happy about it. When this happens they will look somewhere else for a job. But...Spirit...no way.

Phred
 
Delta retirements...

Impressive. Nearly 65 percent of the list in the next 12 years or so. Boggle the mind on how may training events that is! Lots of movement...all good...

This from the "other" website:

Mandatory retirements:
2013 - 56
2014 - 121
2015 - 169
2016 - 225
2017 - 286
2018 - 415
2019 - 513
2020 - 602
2021 - 789
2022 - 851
2023 - 809
2024 - 805
2025 - 713
2026 - 610
2027 - 514



Bye Bye---General Lee
 
There are guys leaving AT but there will not be 2300. Morale isn't too good over here and before the OSW crowd jumps in with "you should be thankful you have a job with a great company", "98% strike vote" etc the FACT of the matter is that morale is low. You cannot change a person's bidding power, family QOL, vacation bidding power (to name just a few) in a negative way and expect that person to be happy about it. When this happens they will look somewhere else for a job. But...Spirit...no way.

Phred

To the contrary, Phred....I think leaving for Delta or someone else may very well be a good call for AT or SWA guys at the bottom of the list depending on their situation. Age, domicile, financial situation are all factors. SWA is going to be stagnant for the foreseeable future. SWA is a great company to work for, but timing might be extremely bad for many and timing is everything in this industry. Our COO is already floating bankruptcy and furloughs as options...and just a few days before Christmas. This is the not the SWA of old. This deal was bad for pilots on both sides no matter how you look at it. If you are an east coast guy on the bottom here, your life could suck for quite awhile. The east is very senior and if you can't hold a line here, you are essentially on a B scale with a poor QOL for the forseeable future. Commuting across the country to 4 on 3 off reserve with little flying is no way to go through life. Good luck to all and I hope we can all be good to each other on the line as this is a management vs pilot problem not a pilot vs pilot problem. Like Mongo, we are just pawns in game of life.
 
No you don't, but that's a different discussion.

He wasn't really talking about SW entering bankruptcy but he was talking about how all the competitors had gone thru the wash and rinse of bankruptcy protection to become more competitive. Pretty much every old school legacy.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top