Over the last six months I ve read numerous articles from the clt papers and wsj quoting D Bronner of the RSA who now owns 37% of US Airways. He keeps mentioning that he would like to acquire some ual assets and
employees for the following reasons:
1. give ual cash to emerge from bk
2. help ual lower its unit costs
3. keep the assets within the code share
some points to ponder if the two had combined.
1. us would have eliminated the md 80's f100's and 737-200's
2. downsized PIT
3. closed the PIT training facility
4. strengthened the carribean
Whatever these knuckleheaded ceo's do lets hope they can preserve jobs and step up to the plate and
compete in the low yield low cost market.
employees for the following reasons:
1. give ual cash to emerge from bk
2. help ual lower its unit costs
3. keep the assets within the code share
some points to ponder if the two had combined.
1. us would have eliminated the md 80's f100's and 737-200's
2. downsized PIT
3. closed the PIT training facility
4. strengthened the carribean
Whatever these knuckleheaded ceo's do lets hope they can preserve jobs and step up to the plate and
compete in the low yield low cost market.