SWAPA "AIP reached with Company"

[MINIME]

...and you just proved my point. Is this you in the video....or your sister perhaps???:laugh:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=1&v=nU5cMZymSr0

In case you need help with some comprehension, the bear does not understand english and will never understand...just like you will never understand...

Phred

Very funny, but the poor Gal clearly represents the pilots after they signed that industry leading deal. It's a clear representation of what you will be doing in front of the company and an arbitrator/judge, when they start excercising what YOU gave them.

 

[Ty Webb]

Very funny, but the poor Gal clearly represents the pilots after they signed that industry leading deal. It's a clear representation of what you will be doing in front of the company and an arbitrator/judge, when they start excercising what YOU gave them.

Yup.

.uke:

 

[Flopgut]

So you are talking like the company does . You think there is good codeshare and bad codeshare .

I think you just made the Christmas card list of every airline CEO

Is your current codeshare sustainable? No. You'll lose it eventually. You're too expensive, have stale cabin service, and you have one (1) airplane type. Not only is it not the ideal airplane type, you can't get an etops flt off the ground. Vote this down, get a reality check, get some code share plans that will benefit you.

 

[HowardBorden]

get some code share plans that will benefit you.

You and all the myopic defeatists are the problem with this industry. The really sad part is you think you're "enlightened."

 

[Flopgut]

You and all the myopic defeatists are the problem with this industry. The really sad part is you think you're "enlightened."

It's a big world Howie. Welcome to it.

All those years of cake-eating didn't do you any favors.

 

[HowardBorden]

It's a big world Howie. Welcome to it.

All those years of cake-eating didn't do you any favors.

Crawl back in your hole. The folks that actually know what it's like to fly their own code are having a professional discussion here.

 

[Flopgut]

Crawl back in your hole. The folks that actually know what it's like to fly their own code are having a professional discussion here.

Youre having a discussion all right. Interesting reading to say the least. You guys are a joke. Easy come, easy go

 

[HowardBorden]

Youre having a discussion all right. Interesting reading to say the least. You guys are a joke. Easy come, easy go

Actually the ironclad scope didn't come easily, it cost us dearly. My hope is it won't go easily either. Most are willing to fight for it just like was done during last section 6 when it was tightened even more.

You think the right decision is to cave on scope. YOU ARE UNEQUIVOCALLY WRONG AND MISGUIDED!

I'm just mystified and absolutely baffled that someone that proclaims to work under a CBA that allows:

223 - 76 seat RJ's
102 - 70 seat RJ's
125 - 50 seat RJ's

would come here and preach SWA pilots that they should loosen scope language. How is that working out for you? Is it going so well that you think everyone should give it a try?

In a word, unbelievable.

 

[Flopgut]

You know Howie, you might consider not acting like a d!ck for a few posts and embrace any competing idea to voting in what you're faced with right now?? Because it's going to be a lot less fun for you to look up exact RJ/outsourcing numbers the rest of us live with if your coworkers vote this in. Make any sense to you at all?

 

[Crash Pad]

Those numbers are staggering. Don't worry we are going to flip the script and outsource the widebody!