FlyChicaga
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2002
- Posts
- 862
Regarding the scan issue...
You'll be surprised at how much a good scan of the EFIS "tape" system will be very helpful in being effective on the line. You can only follow the flight director so much before it gets you into trouble. Like when ATC gives you a short vector and the localizer captures inside the FAF, so you are following a FD which is keeping you at 3000 feet 2 miles from the airport on the localizer.
The flight director is an excellent guide to where the aircraft should go. It requires a delicate balance between properly using the automation controls via the flight guidance panel and taking in the information from your instruments. Relying on the flight director is a dangerous gamble, which someday could put you in a very precarious situation.
The glass-cockpit system in the ERJ is very user-friendly in terms of a scan. Everything you really need is right there in front of you: Airspeed, Altitude, Attitude, Vertical Speed, the ball for coordination, localizer, glideslope, and autopilot/flight director modes. You don't hardly need to move your eyes to get all the information you need to fly the airplane with extreme precision and smoothness.
I'm going to go ahead and make a bold statement: If you don't have a good scan, you are not going to fly this airplane like it should be. And the passengers in back will feel it... trust me, in my times jumpseating I can feel the jerkiness on the controls of someone who has a poor scan. It's just setting you up for getting behind the airplane... especially at times when the scan is very critical, like shooting a CAT II approach to minimums like we did this morning in EWR.
Automation is a tool. Use it properly, and it can reduce your workload quite a bit. Rely on it too much, and don't use it properly, and it will make your life very difficult, and possibly put you into a situation where you don't want to be.
You'll be surprised at how much a good scan of the EFIS "tape" system will be very helpful in being effective on the line. You can only follow the flight director so much before it gets you into trouble. Like when ATC gives you a short vector and the localizer captures inside the FAF, so you are following a FD which is keeping you at 3000 feet 2 miles from the airport on the localizer.
The flight director is an excellent guide to where the aircraft should go. It requires a delicate balance between properly using the automation controls via the flight guidance panel and taking in the information from your instruments. Relying on the flight director is a dangerous gamble, which someday could put you in a very precarious situation.
The glass-cockpit system in the ERJ is very user-friendly in terms of a scan. Everything you really need is right there in front of you: Airspeed, Altitude, Attitude, Vertical Speed, the ball for coordination, localizer, glideslope, and autopilot/flight director modes. You don't hardly need to move your eyes to get all the information you need to fly the airplane with extreme precision and smoothness.
I'm going to go ahead and make a bold statement: If you don't have a good scan, you are not going to fly this airplane like it should be. And the passengers in back will feel it... trust me, in my times jumpseating I can feel the jerkiness on the controls of someone who has a poor scan. It's just setting you up for getting behind the airplane... especially at times when the scan is very critical, like shooting a CAT II approach to minimums like we did this morning in EWR.
Automation is a tool. Use it properly, and it can reduce your workload quite a bit. Rely on it too much, and don't use it properly, and it will make your life very difficult, and possibly put you into a situation where you don't want to be.