Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

If you're voting YES...

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
So which is it, do the majors hate purchasing aircraft more than anything else, or do they want feeder pilots who "meet their future cost structure requirements" within a 2% margin?

You make it sound like it is one set of regional pilots here who get to decide the fate of the future of the industry.

Perhaps it is Delta's decision to make here. From their perspective, if they really hate spending billions of dollars purchasing RJs, are they going to walk away from someone else buying the RJs because the pilots cost 2% more than their "cost structure requirements"? Will they step over dollars to pick up dimes?

Right now, this offer is not meeting my family's future cost structure requirements.

Well Put>>>>>Vote NO
 
Having been long since out of the piloting side of the industry, you guys are faced with an interesting problem. You have to come to the realization that you are outdated on one side of your merger (XJT), and un-competitive on another side of it (ASA). This leaves you in a precarious position. It's not any pilot groups fault, but the world around you has changed. Gone are the days when the network carriers owned and then sold off their regionals when they were in financial trouble to raise capital to stay afloat. These sales came with hefty profit margins built into the contracts that went with the sale. Now the network carriers are atoning for their sins by using their wholly owned regional carriers to put the squeeze on the independent regional airlines to lower the cost structure to meet their requirements for the future. You see there is one thing the network carriers hate to do more than anything else, finance RJ's for their regional carriers. Sure they will use a few aircraft as leverage to get their wholly owned airlines to play ball, but by and large they are looking for somebody else to do the heavy lifting.

This is where companies like SkyWest and Republic come into the fray. Both have money, both have the ability to finance, and both have labor problems. Neither can guarantee anything to their pilots in the way of aircraft or jobs at a major, yet they are due the lions share of the "new" aircraft coming online to feed the network carrier's machine. All of the wholly owned airlines have contractual guarantees for far less aircraft than they have currently, yet the pilots of the independents still cry foul. It stands to reason that there is a much brighter future for the independent pilots as far as stability is concerned if they allow their respective airlines to swallow up all of the growth that the network carriers make available. Major network carriers hate to finance aircraft to be operated by someone who can back away from them at a moments notice (Mesa), yet the pilots at Republic and XJT (who can bring their own aircraft to the table) seem to want to fight this opportunity at every step. It stands to reason that half of the regional airline pilots will be moving on to network carriers in the next 5-8 years, but where are you going to be in the mean time?


Sincerely, Bholt and Davenewie


There, fixed it for you!
 
... Except in the last year all three majors bought large orders of crjs and e175s. The ml prefers to buy the planes and lease them to rj operators under cpas. That way they move airplanes at will without regionals pulling planes out from under them and without losing revenues from the planes in the process.

Skyw thinks buying the planes themselves will give them leverage with the ml partners and a carrot with pilots. They've been wrong on both accounts.

Of the six hundred orders and options they have, there's barely a commitment for a fraction of them. Even if they do find flying, the penalties for not meeting contractual obligations due to staffing will be substantial.

As the regional lift providers thin out, ml will either move capacity up, possibly flying those planes themselves, or the regionals will gain pricing power. In the mean time I'm not going to "pay for the sins" of my employer with what amounts to the loss of one month's pay per year and the reduction of qol which amounts to the destruction of family life.

I have confidence Skyw will make money with us one way or another or go under trying. But I'm not going to go back on food stamps until I leave while they figure it out.
 
Last edited:
The problem for the a Regionals is ml scope clauses aren't going to allow unlimited 76 seaters, or anything larger. In good times, concessions are hard to come by. Thanks to Consolidation, better times for the remaining 3 legacies will stick around even longer. The Regionals can try to go it alone, like Indy Air, and probably falter the same way. Most Regionals don't participate largely in the advertising side, plus reservations, and all of the other perks that go along with feeding a legacy. Huge new costs would be incurred when starting an independent airline. Really doubtful.

But, good news is the big 3 will be hiring 15,000 in the next 10 years, with better pay, retirement, and variety. Good luck and Merry Xmas!




Bye Bye---General Lee
 
Jenny Jenny Jenny, you missed wms's points completely. Has nothing to do with scope. SKYW and others will configure seats to comply with the scope limit. Thats a given. What we're talking about here is the company gutting our QOL and pay to keep their profits up so management can line their pockets. The ASA Pres got something like a $3-400K raise or more and now makes around $1.3 - $1.6 mil in salary alone! That's fine but don't come after our pay & benefits to make up for it!
 
Last edited:
Maybe its time the pilots dangle a carrot in front of mainline management for a change. We come up with a pay scale for 100+ seat aircraft that is cheaper than the mainline pilots will fly them but more than what we make now. Then we tell mainline if they get scope relief we will fly them for that rate. Fight fire with fire.

The result could be growth and higher income earning opportunities at the regional level.
 
I'd say demand equal or more than ml to fly the same planes, then ml will move even more capacity up creating more ml opportunities for pilots.

The regional pilots reps have been distracted by trying to keep regional jobs, not realizing we should be demanding more to make increasing capacity at the ml even more attractive to ml managements.
 
I'd say demand equal or more than ml to fly the same planes, then ml will move even more capacity up creating more ml opportunities for pilots.

The regional pilots reps have been distracted by trying to keep regional jobs, not realizing we should be demanding more to make increasing capacity at the ml even more attractive to ml managements.

That may sound good, but certain interviewing/hiring decisions indicate that they may prefer to hire younger, more pliable type pilots. Translation--the guys making decent money at the regionals now, with experience and a backbone, may not be the ones moving up to ml.

Examples:

--Delta's preference for military pilots. Common sense says it's easier to train a guy to move from flying 121 pax out of C concourse, to flying 121 pax out of B concourse, than it is to train a guy who's used to flying single-pilot single-engine combat trips for the same job. Yet they prefer the military jocks because they have been indoctrinated to say "yes sir! how high sir?!"

--U.S. Airways' requirement for a training cycle within the last five years--keeps out the older, more experienced, more opinionated guys

--every major's preference for dangling interviews in front of pliable regional pilot groups. If you drink the kool-aide, you get the job.

If all regional guys stood to move right into those mainline jobs, regionals would have been integrated into the majors long ago. They don't want certain ones of us on their seniority lists. Be careful what you wish for.
 
I'd say demand equal or more than ml to fly the same planes, then ml will move even more capacity up creating more ml opportunities for pilots.

The regional pilots reps have been distracted by trying to keep regional jobs, not realizing we should be demanding more to make increasing capacity at the ml even more attractive to ml managements.

You seem to be operating under the assumption that everyone wants to go to mainline. Not so.
 
For the skitzo!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top