Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Furloughed mainline pilots entitled to left seat of their regional carriers?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
No they don't get a "pass" anyone who takes a job and/or starts a career without doing even cursory research is a moron. By your logic a guy who takes a job at a factory where a bunch of people are standing around the gates with signs and yell at them every time they drive onto the property should get a "pass" too. PCL you started your career on the wrong foot and you profess to have seen the light, B.S. you have a history of making bad decisions to further your "career" and use the noob excuse to justify them. You cause more damage to the ALPA/organized cause, with your disjointed rants. You remind me of the militant "born again", AA(alcoholics, not pilots) 12 step reformers who think that they have found the "WAY".
PBR

PBR... PCL doesn't get it because he PFT'd his way to where he is now. He was the guy who didn't do any cursory research. Funny how he personally gives Go-jets a pass but earlier was saying the UAX carriers were not to be trusted becasue Go-jets name was on the letter. PCL your stance is very vague and quite frankly it appears you are trying to cover your past mistakes with your ALPA front.
 
Last edited:
Regarding UAX carriers and "flow back" to the left seat

Whose metal is it? UAL? Or MESA? Or SKYW?

Back of the line. You took the risk as did we all. I would expect nothing less if I went to UAL. Why should you be entitled to more?

Arrogance perhaps?
 
Here's an idea:

If you lost your job at an ALPA carrier - you go to any regional and have ALPA make up the difference between first and second year FO pay so the furloughee can at least survive/make better cash than unemployment. You start as a bottom-of-the-list FO for bidding purposes.

Or.... if you have a "flow-back" option, you go to the bottom of the list as an FO and get paid years of service from the carrier from which you are coming from. In other words, if you are a 2nd year NWA FO, you go to the bottom of the list for bidding purposes, but make 2nd year FO pay.

But in any case, it's not right for any mainline guy to go back to regionals and displace anyone already there.

It's not a matter of "right" or "wrong".

I always hate it when "major" pilots complain about "they're flying OUR jets". Well, yes and no. The fact is, in most cases those major pilots negotiated to allow scope to take those off the property in exchange for other things . . . and one of those things is FLOWBACK.

Contracted lift companies, and by extension the pilots who agree to fly with them, agreed to this stipulation and enjoy the benefits in times of growth and plenty. Nevertheless, their companies agreed to FLOWBACK as a condition to that growth.

So . . I would agree that airline pilots should get EXACTLY what they negotiated from their carriers; no more, no less. They shouldn't feel the slightest bit of guilt for doing it either. This is something planned out and bargained between the airline, the airline pilot, and the contracted lift company long before the downturn activated a FLOWBACK situation.

Do I feel sympathy for the contracted pilot? Absolutely!!! Of all parties involved, he was probably the only one who never had a seat at the table. But it's in no way "unfair". He chose to work under conditions where he knew this was a possibility, and benefited from the growth and expansion in the good times.

He should also have known going in this could happen, and plan for the eventuality. While I'm sympathetic the angst your post represents, it's really a case of wanting to change the rules after the game has been decided.

As an aside, I assure you, no airline pilot is thrilled at having to go back and having to work at a contracted lift company either.
 
Last edited:
So if I were to "see the light" and decide that I want to become an Air Tran pilot....I could look forward to making about $350K less in the next 8 years.....

That depends on what you think will happen to FO rates in the next TA. The FOs here are a slight majority, and a lot of CAs are sticking up for us also, so there wont' be a new contract without big FO pay raises. I estimate another 2 years until a new contract, then the FO rates will be significantly higher, most likely.

Then what do I make as a 9th. year captain?

Again, depends on how much you want to fly. Average would be about $150k. One 8-year CA I flew with showed me his paystub back in December, and he was at $170k for the year, but he always tries to credit at least 90 hours. In the long run, you'd make a lot more here since you're still pretty young, but you would have to suffer in the short term.
 
SVT, I believe the "flow back" part of regional lift agreements are not as typical as you think they are.
 
SVT, I believe the "flow back" part of regional lift agreements are not as typical as you think they are.

I know. They're actually quite rare, very restrictive when they apply, and not that great of a deal for the mainline pilot.

The "flow up" is a far, far better deal for prospective airline pilot hopefuls than the other way around.

Another reason why I find the consternation generated by this topic a bit silly. A much bigger concern should be "if times are so rough that flowback is necessary, will the airline my company provides lift for survive if the airline goes BK and tears up our contract?"
 

Latest resources

Back
Top