Lear70
JAFFO
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2003
- Posts
- 7,487
Nope. I'm a proponent of strict time limits on food stamps as well as unemployment benefits. They exist to hold people over until they can get a job, not to support people for life.I see that you are a proponent of the entitlement society, comrade.
It's not about entitlement, it's about taking advantage of the programs that YOU need when YOU have paid into them for all your adult life.
I look at it as an insurance policy. I pay premiums (taxes) and when I have an event that requires a payout (unemployment), I expect a return on my premiums. Period.
That's not "entitlement"; that's receiving benefits that I ALREADY PAID FOR. It's not rocket science.
I didn't say it WAS the issue. I also didn't say I was mad about the amount of taxes I pay (I'm not crazy about it, but it's about the same as any proposed "flat tax" would be after my deductions).If you are angry about the amount of taxes you have paid, I agree with you. That is not the issue.
What I DID say was that, as a taxpayer, I have every right to take advantage of any programs that will benefit me should I become unemployed. I've already paid for that right. What about this is difficult to understand?
First, it's not "millions" of pilots out of jobs, which is what this thread is about: retraining of unemployed pilots by paying for type ratings.Extrapolate out type ratings, or the equivalent cost, among the literally millions of other workers who have lost their jobs, you would see that the concept is untenable.
Second, like I said, if those pilots have paid taxes, they have paid for these benefits. End of story. By YOUR reasoning, it was unfair to tax those pilots in the first place, as you would cut them all off without a dime the day the company shut down? Because unemployment benefits are just a "government handout" and those are bad, right? What about food stamps while you're on unemployment looking for a job? Bad again?
Where's the cutoff between "bad" acceptance of government aid, and "good" acceptance of government aid, if you've been a taxpayer for all of your adult life?
Please inform us, oh sanctimonious one, because YOUR ideas of right and wrong MUST be the correct ones...
I don't know, "Buddy"... I'm hearing crickets on your side of the fence. Where are those other "millions"?Of course, if you are just a crybaby that has to rely on the 'gubment to fix all of your personal shortcomings, then maybe six type ratings will do the trick. Your problem is that I, and millions of other taxpayers, oppose this abuse of public funds, Buddy.
Here's a hint: it's not an "abuse" of public funds if you are the one who gave them those funds in the first place; I think you're the only one here saying it is.
When you are the only one screaming your "message", maybe something is wrong with the way YOU think...?
Just a thought.
Good luck to everyone who is job seeking or will be soon...
Last edited: