Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Free First Officers!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I had a favorite intern. When she would be scheduled to come in, I would crank up the a/c. The effect on her was, ah, impressive. I was so bad...

:D
 
A Squared
I have "got it" right from the start. If Company Y has 5 1900's and 10 crews, that's 10 FO positions which you and your ilk are making unavailable by agreeing to pay to sit in those seats.

youre still a bit aggressive there mate, slow down. I am starting to see your point of view. You, and the other posters, have to understand that where I come from, there is no such thing as Eagle Jet or pft or anything. first I heard of it, was seeing Eagle's advert in a magazine, and getting info on forums like this.

But what you have to understand, is that you are not going to change the industry and the management types signing on for options like what eagle and asg provides, by calling me names.

you and your ilk
you dont know me from a bar of soap, so dont categorize me

Timebuilder
And you can save a bunch of money by doing an initial type at Simcom.

please tell me more, hows this differ from Flightsafety? Or which school or org that you know of, offers the best deal on the Lear or similar type rating ? Info appreciated.:D
 
Last edited:
Ok.

While the Flightsafety training can only be called "first rate", their prices are equally stunning. It's like asking Elle Mac Pherson out on a date. Expect to spend a lot of money for a high visibility experience.

PanAm Academy took over Simcom, and built a new facility at Orlando, FL. Here is a link to their Lear training price page, under "business avaition". It's a PDF file.

http://www.panamacademy.com/simcom/2003 Lear 3536.pdf

Check the FSI prices, and you'll see what I mean.
 
Timebuilder thaks, I actually got that info already, but cant find the Flightsafety info on the website? Is it available, or do you need to contact FS for them?
 
they do not have the skills knowledge or experience to safely act as flight crew on part121 or any other ops.

Try telling that to the former cadets at many UK airlines who are flying all over Europe at 300 TT, or the guys and girls coming out of Ft. Rucker with less than that. And don't give me the "They've been specially selected and trained" routine. If you have a CPL and CFI/II/MEI ratings you've been specially trained too. Oddly enough there are things that make a military helo easier to fly than civie (coupled rudder-collective, etc.). Let's all be honest with ourselves shall we? With the technology available today and the vastly improved airway systems there aren't many who have obtained a commercial mutli who couldn't fly your average airliner. The older Lears, Jetstars, etc are much tougher to master I feel, and there are 500-hour wonders beating these aircraft all over the US. I'm sorry but we're just not that special. Most true morons are weeded out in training or by the Grim Reaper before they hit 500 hours. Though there are exceptions. I work with one now that I think about it.

Those of you who said you wouldn't PFT even if you had the money to do so are either not being honest or you just didn't want to fly as badly as every other professional pilot I've ever known in eight years of flying. More than likely the former. But we'll never know will we. It's too late so we'll just sit back and judge those who did. That's much easier on our egos than a hard and honest look in the mirror.

Mama B.
 
I gotta raise the B.S. flag here Mrs Boeing. Unlike quite a few people who 'sold' their souls to fly an airplane, I consider myself a professional with professional credentials offering professional service of flying an airplane. As such, if you want me to fly, you will pay me. I will not pay you for the privilege of flying an airplane unless I am renting a plane for joyriding. I am one of those who absolutely refused to PFT. I never instructed a day in my life - flew skydivers, VFR 135 tours and cargo and commuter to get to this point. I started getting paid for my flying services 2 days after my commercial checkride when I started dropping skydivers. I never paid a dime for multiengine time past my rating. I actually got paid to get multi time, and I got my first multiengine job flying checks in a Seneca with 8 hours of multi (bare rating). Was I making big $$$? Hell no, but I was getting paid something. Did I have an option of PFT? You bet. My family offered time and time again which I refused every time. Something about character and morals.

So what you may say. Well, I am walking tall and walking proud. Looking back on my career, I am very proud to say I never fell for any PFT scam, and that I contributed my share to end PFT by refusing time after time to fall for it.

My reward? Well, I just turned 27. I have a type rating in a DHC-8 from my old job. I'm a B737 FO right now for an airline I was shooting for from early on in my career and intend to retire from. I might have missed some seniority numbers by refusing to PFT. However, you can't beat the experience and the character I've built along the way, and once again, I am standing tall and walking proud - I paid my dues the right way - working my way through.
 
Mrs. Boeing wrote:

Try telling that to the former cadets at many UK airlines who are flying all over Europe at 300 TT...

I don't agree with your conclusion, Mrs. B. OK, so are you saying that the 300 hour wonders in Europe--and here--are as safe and prepared as your average 1500 hour "CFI turned night check hauler turned frieght dog turned commuter pilot?"

You and I both know that is not the case. Even the military recognizes that 300 hour pilots need special management via flight/section leads, very involved supervision and (mostly) resrictive operating environments. Once they gain enough experience, they shed some of the above noted constraints, but not before. I've been there and seen it in action. Young pilots can be safe pilots, but they need guidance.

Would I have been safe to fly passengers in a 121 environment at 300 hours? Nope. Does that assessment parlay into a general caveat? Probably. Don't you think that the Captains in Europe who deal with these "youngsters" have a more difficult time dealing with inexperience in the cockpit? There is no substitute for experience (a profundity that should go without saying, but I said it anyway...)

I don't have a problem looking myself in the mirror; as Popeye so correctly says "I yam what I yam...," a pilot who's proud of what he's accomplished, knowing full well that there is much still left to learn.
 
And don't give me the "They've been specially selected and trained" routine.

I see that you are already familiar with the faults of you own argument. Neither military or UK students are anywhere close to the unscreened, average self-selected PFT participant. Some military transition pilots see PFT as a way to build fixed wing experience, but just as many other former military pilots frown on PFT.

Those of you who said you wouldn't PFT even if you had the money to do so are either not being honest or you just didn't want to fly as badly as every other professional pilot I've ever known in eight years of flying

Grand assuptions on your part. Grand, but I can tell you that you are 100% wrong in my case. All of the money I have ever had is not worth demeaning myself to take the PFT route. That's a judgement. Life is full of them. The key is to learn how to make the BEST judgments possible.

I first held a flight yoke in 1961. It's not "too late" for me, either. I'm not sure what you are trying to say, if there is any intent beyond attempting to characterize naysayers such as myself in the category of "crybaby". In fact, I see widebody pay coming down, while mine is going up. So, I'm happy to provide a little guidance to the newer, younger pilots who will see this thread, and the ones like it. And you are correct in one respect. I really don't want to fly badly. I want to fly well, with my self respect intact.

Some folks don't know how good that feels.

Great post, Eagleflip.
 
Last edited:
My hat's off to the veritable paragons of virtue we are blessed to be in the presence of. You are to be well and truly commended. I commend you. If you really mean it - and you may - I really do admire you for it. But I'm sure you can understand gentlemen I have a very hard time believing you based on what I've personally seen and heard in the real world. You say you wouldn't, we can't prove it one way or the other, so I will take you at your word and salute you.

Now, here's why I don't buy it. I was personally told by senior UA Captain (check airman on 747) that the best way to fly professionally was to "attend one of them there schools that use you for an FO. That's excellent experience and cheaper than renting a King Air". And there's more. I have a family member who flys an MD-80 at CO and was on the interview team when CO was hiring in the late 90s. Just after I reentered the civie world he encouraged me to go to Gulfstream Acadamy or one of the ones operating back then to get the ME turbine fixed-wing time and the 121 experience. And when he was interviewing aspiring CO jocks in 1999 he mentioned he had seen guys with those schools on resumes and he thought that was "the smart play" and that I should have done it. Unfortunately he hadn't offered to pay for it or I would have. I may have been farther ahead than I am now, or I might just have a seniority number but be working at Home Depot. I don't know.

I have mentioned the PFT debates I've read about here to at least five captains at major(2) and regional(3) airlines that I've known well from former jobs or through family, and every single one felt that is the best route through the system. Without exception. And this with no prompting from me whatsoever. I didn't let them know I had any feelings about it one way or the other because I don't, I just asked.

I hate to burst your bubble but the people interviewing at the airlines don't care if you PFTd nor do they admire you for not doing it even though you had the money. That's just a fact. When I spoke further with one of the captians (AA-A300) he said "You're just hearing from a small minority of younger pilots. Believe me no one at the major or the large regionals cares where you got your time. They want to know that your competent and that they'll be able to get along with you for five days straight."

Hey, I'm just the messenger, boys. Don't flame me if your agenda doesn't reflect the reality of airline hiring. Ask the grey-beards here. I've seen a few here over the past year. Ask them if they care or not.

Mama
 

Latest resources

Back
Top