Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

ALPA vs ALPA merger

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
You forgot about the love field slot;) !
I was wondering if it's possible that the Asian carrier that was interested might be a player in this as well !!?! To fill in the pieces you speak of ..

Wasn't BT, JH and some other players in China within the last month or so meeting with a Chinese carrier?

Here's another option;

Why would AS give or lease those scare-buses to JB? So JB could use them against AS, like Allegiant did with the MD-80's. What about Boeing taking those buses in a deal with AS to buy or lease 10-15 767ER's?? Those 767's would be used to fly international out of SEA, SFO, LAX and JFK. Boeing is having a fire-side sale on 767's, they are trying to keep the line going.

AS would be able to start feeding its own international flights to Asia and Europe. That combined with the code share agreements with other foreign carriers makes for interesting fodder huh?!?!
 
Well, it's a done deal! 2.6 Bil/$57 a share! Interesting tid-bit, AK is signaling they may want to keep the scare-buses initially, training mx folks to work on them.
 
Date of hire then put them in the stack on some kind of ratio ... With fences on equipment
 
But seriously I don't see the company wanting any Alaska guys moving over to the bus .. But want the Virgin guys moving over to the Boeing ...
 
But seriously I don't see the company wanting any Alaska guys moving over to the bus .. But want the Virgin guys moving over to the Boeing ...

I think you are correct! The only caveat being if they decide to keep those scare-buses long term, until the leases expire! Then I could see a JFK or SFO scare-bus base. That would allow them to still operate the buses, taking advantage of the leases and lower operating costs,(no heavy checks etc) especially if they are still under some type of incentive deal from Toulouse.

That would keep a MX base with those airplanes, my guess would be JFK, gives them an east coast base to perform daily checks and light mx. Plus it's closer to the heavy mx base on the east coast.
 
Wasn't BT, JH and some other players in China within the last month or so meeting with a Chinese carrier?

Here's another option;

Why would AS give or lease those scare-buses to JB? So JB could use them against AS, like Allegiant did with the MD-80's. What about Boeing taking those buses in a deal with AS to buy or lease 10-15 767ER's?? Those 767's would be used to fly international out of SEA, SFO, LAX and JFK. Boeing is having a fire-side sale on 767's, they are trying to keep the line going.

AS would be able to start feeding its own international flights to Asia and Europe. That combined with the code share agreements with other foreign carriers makes for interesting fodder huh?!?!

The day AS buys 767's or any widebody and starts flying international out of SEA, SFO, LAX, and JFK will be the end of many code share deals they presently have.
AS will have to decide whether it wants to be a code share $#@#$ to every foreign airline looking to do business in the US or become it's own flag carrier.
 
Code sharing with a foriegn carrier has its benefits. At least you can reasonably assume they won't try to "merge" you and tack your pilots onto the bottom of someone else's seniority list.
 
The day AS buys 767's or any widebody and starts flying international out of SEA, SFO, LAX, and JFK will be the end of many code share deals they presently have.
AS will have to decide whether it wants to be a code share $#@#$ to every foreign airline looking to do business in the US or become it's own flag carrier.


Sucks that DAL UAL and AA don't code share with any other foreign carriers. AK would be hosed if they got bigger planes.
 
ALPA Merger Policy lays out a process and several guidelines, but doesn't have a methodology for integration. In practice, Jim is correct about relative seniority playing a large factor in most arbitrator decisions, but it's not codified in ALPA Merger Policy.

Merger Policy follows a simple formula:

1. Direct negotiations between the two pilot merger committees to try to reach a deal

2. If that fails, go to mediation to see if a mediator can assist in reaching a consensual deal

3. If that still doesn't work, go to arbitration, and arbitrators are directed to take into account various factors such as career expectations.

For a JetBlue/Virgin merger, expect largely straight ratio within status (captain and FO) with maybe some extra slotting near the top for JetBlue pilots to account for a pilot group with a longer average length of service, but not much.

What would you say for AS-VX?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top