Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

ALPA 401k vote.

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
They don't, the "rate" is the same. The only thing the vote was for was the wage amount that qualified for the dues. If a 401k was the only source of retirement, it was exempt. And I guess still is. I personally don't think it should be subject to dues.


I get the rate thing but clearly one group is paying more money by virtue of skewed formula. Either way it's biased and I highly doubt it's legal.

Besides, who's to say their A plan is going to be there at retirement? Stupid. I hope it got shot down. If the executive board wants more money then can share mustache trimmers.
 
Like ALPO cares about what the vote results are...........

Remember Age 65 ???

This one is different....with the Age 65...you had the members of the BOD voting to go along with the change.

Here you have the members of the BOD saying...."No way" !!!

Good for them
 
This one is different....with the Age 65...you had the members of the BOD voting to go along with the change.

Here you have the members of the BOD saying...."No way" !!!

Good for them

Actually, the BOD never had a say in the Age 65 policy change. Prater got it forced through with only votes from the EC and EB. I question whether it would have passed a full BOD vote.
 
It failed by 55% to 45%. 66.6% was required for it to pass. In other words, not even close. The BOD did the right thing.

The BOD did do the right thing... for the wrong reason...

appeasing the membership base for their disconnect is part of politics...

the logic for putting everyone one on the same fair dues rate was sound...

lots of temper tantrums for something going ones way....
 

Latest resources

Back
Top