Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Age 60 informal poll

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Abolish the Age 60 Rule for other that Part 91 pilots?

  • Yea

    Votes: 668 35.5%
  • Nay

    Votes: 1,214 64.5%

  • Total voters
    1,882
Unfortunately, I didn't put the poll only question up. Who ever did, set it up backwards from the original post. Sneeky jerk, probably did it on purpose just to throw the results. I didn't pay attention either and voted opposite to my opinion. Therefore, the only accurate way at this point is to continue with the text vote and I'll keep track and keep you posted as often as possible.

The question again as simple as possible with out any strange wording:

Should the age 60 mandatory retirment rule for FAR part 121 operations be abolished? Yea or Nay

I'll post the current results on the next post, stand by...
 
New numbers based on the text vote as of post #155
(because the poll only question is totally screwed up):

97 votes:

44 YEA (14 mil/30 civ) abolish the rule
54 NAY (16 mil/38 cvi) keep it at 60

56% say keep it the way it is. 44% say the age 60 rule sucks.

Don't forget: vote in text and screw the poll only question.

Of course you can fly a 150 after 60, but why?

Focus: what's up with the random thoughts, boosting your post numbers? Keep it to votes only
 
No frickin' way!!!
 
71KILO said:
The question again as simple as possible with out any strange wording:

Should the age 60 mandatory retirment rule for FAR part 121 operations be abolished? Yea or Nay

I'll post the current results on the next post, stand by...
That wasn't the original question. Originally Yes=change the rule No=keep the rule.
 
Bringupthebird said:
That wasn't the original question. Originally Yes=change the rule No=keep the rule.

A complait was made that the question was too hard to understand and that the 60 rule applys to -121 ops only versus other than -91. So I worded it more simply, but it is the same question. The moderator (or someone else, I'm not sure) added the poll only question at the top of the thread and worded it opposite of the thread text question in post #1. Your text vote is therefore still good.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top