Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Avantair called

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Broke, I usually like your posts, but here you sound just like NJW. I don't know didly about Netjets. Citationair? Flex? Flops? I wish them all the best. But unless they worked here, they don't know crap about what goes on here, anymore than I know about what goes on at their outfits. Good luck wherever you work, Broke. I hope you have the working conditions you want. I do.

Is this a pattern? Is all of this chatter because we are actually hiring and dare I say it, growing? Is this jelousy?

well you cant print sarcasm. its fun to watch b19 get all flustered.
 
I thought njw said she was going to keep her nose out of our business since she has no clue what happens here. I knew it was too good to be true that she would honor her word.

Glass, thanks for egging her on - it's truly appreciated, really. (like broke just said, you can't print sarcasm)
 
Broke, I strongly believe in doing all we can to get our true meaning to come across as we intend it to. In the spirit of some friendly advice...:) here are some tips:

:rolleyes: = Sarcasm I also use it for frustration and general disbelief at what I'm hearing.

:erm: helps me show that I find something particularly odd, unsettling, etc.

;) is for teasing, or to share a private joke.

The rest are all pretty much self-explanatory. I believe they were designed to enhance communication and help avoid misunderstandings when our intent might not be as clear as we'd like. It might feel strange at first if you aren't used to them but I think you'd be pleased w/the results if you give the emoticons a try...:) NJW
 
Dill, as you have rightly noted, I responded to a request from Glass....and also to Waco during the course of setting the record straight after B19 posted false statements about me and my husband for the umpteenth time.

I'm quite certain almost everyone posting here reserves the right to counter false accusations. A few folks might not care about their reputation but they're probably a very small minority. Thus, I can well appreciate the Avantair group's desire to distance themselves from one as seemingly unbalanced and dishonest as B19, who has identified himself as being a member of the inner circle at Avantair. That is why I thought it was worth a try to pitch my idea to you guys after Waco offered his very UNhelpful....:rolleyes: suggestion for dealing with B19's obsessive attacks.

Yes, I totally agree that every group has its tools/rotten apples. But it is widely noted that people of integrity will stand up for decency and honesty. Most realize that you give the appearance of condoning attacks and deceit when you stand by silently and make no effort to stop it. I know that I would go to the aid of any FI member who was being lied about and harassed on the board. I would feel even more of an obligation to do so if the attacker was from NJ and was publicly casting NJ in a bad light in the process. I thought that perhaps some of the Avantair pilots would share that viewpoint.

It seems that I'm mistaken in thinking that and also in making a distinction between an occasional friendly chat/observation (especially when I was responding to dialog directed at me first...:rolleyes:) and a much more involved agenda ....for example the way B19 is always on the NJ threads, running his smear campaign and spewing venom at the Union supporters.

I didn't realize you guys were so anti-social....;) Or perhaps it's just a bit of "shoot the messenger" attitude regarding B19 and his connection to Avantair? :erm: Well...if Glass ever decides to question the veracity of my posts again you guys might want to tell him not to bother ....:p Unlike B19, I believe in posting accurately and truthfully. And if Waco suddenly has some brillant...:rolleyes: idea involving me, you might want to ask him to keep it to himself if you don't want to hear me offer an alternative :p I find much more acceptable than being locked in a thread with the "rotten apple" manager who claims to work at Avantair. :erm:

Good luck!
NJW
 
Dill, as you have rightly noted, I responded to a request from Glass....and also to Waco during the course of setting the record straight after B19 posted false statements about me and my husband for the umpteenth time.

I'm quite certain almost everyone posting here reserves the right to counter false accusations. A few folks might not care about their reputation but they're probably a very small minority. Thus, I can well appreciate the Avantair group's desire to distance themselves from one as seemingly unbalanced and dishonest as B19, who has identified himself as being a member of the inner circle at Avantair. That is why I thought it was worth a try to pitch my idea to you guys after Waco offered his very UNhelpful....:rolleyes: suggestion for dealing with B19's obsessive attacks.

Yes, I totally agree that every group has its tools/rotten apples. But it is widely noted that people of integrity will stand up for decency and honesty. Most realize that you give the appearance of condoning attacks and deceit when you stand by silently and make no effort to stop it. I know that I would go to the aid of any FI member who was being lied about and harassed on the board. I would feel even more of an obligation to do so if the attacker was from NJ and was publicly casting NJ in a bad light in the process. I thought that perhaps some of the Avantair pilots would share that viewpoint.

It seems that I'm mistaken in thinking that and also in making a distinction between an occasional friendly chat/observation (especially when I was responding to dialog directed at me first...:rolleyes:) and a much more involved agenda ....for example the way B19 is always on the NJ threads, running his smear campaign and spewing venom at the Union supporters.

I didn't realize you guys were so anti-social....;) Or perhaps it's just a bit of "shoot the messenger" attitude regarding B19 and his connection to Avantair? :erm: Well...if Glass ever decides to question the veracity of my posts again you guys might want to tell him not to bother ....:p Unlike B19, I believe in posting accurately and truthfully. And if Waco suddenly has some brillant...:rolleyes: idea involving me, you might want to ask him to keep it to himself if you don't want to hear me offer an alternative :p I find much more acceptable than being locked in a thread with the "rotten apple" manager who claims to work at Avantair. :erm:

Good luck!
NJW

I dunno...


This looks to me like somebody bailed of out of AMR because they didn't like what the union negotiated. All this was in the contract, right? He could have stayed.. he chose not to. Those words you wrote below.. "He declined" are pretty powerful words.


I consider that bailing out when he didn't get what he though he should have. So, once again..what is false about what I said?


This looks like a union problem, not a managment problem. Your CBA supposed to protect you right?

Looks to me like a voluntary hitting of the silk to me...

All I did was post my interpretation based on your own words:

"I definitely agree, and experienced this firsthand when my husband was laid off from AA right after 9-11. He declined to go into the Eagle side of the airline not only because of the lower pay (he'd just recently completed training), but also because he was hearing that the Eagle pilots didn't want the regular AA guys there--too many hard feelings over the wide pay gap.


http://forums.flightinfo.com/showpost.php?p=414999&postcount=27


 
To set the record straight...

My husband interviewed with and was hired by American Airlines, a major carrier--not by the regional one, Eagle. The American pilots' Union, APA, made up only of AA pilots, had nothing to do with the job offer at Eagle. That was strictly a management idea...a ploy my husband and many others firmly believe...to move the higher paid pilots off the AA payroll and onto the chump-change salary scale at Eagle. When I posted that he "declined" the offer, I was too polite. (I was new here then...:p) Actually, we were both disgusted and my husband rejected management's insult without a moment's hesitation.

To reiterate, my husband holds no ill-will for the APA Union; he fully supports their cause, and would be part of their Volunteer cadre today had AA management not furloughed him against his will. As most of you know, a Union can only negotiate the rules governing a furlough and a recall. My husband no more "bailed" or left as a "voluntary" decision than any of the frac pilots who have been sadly and unwillingly furloughed. Our experience being a victim of managers' mismanagement and poor financial decisions is one of the reasons we have a lot of empathy for furloughed pilots and their families.

I strongly encourage any FI member who reads a questionable and/or suspicious interpretation of my words to ask me for a clarification of my post. Be advised that B19 has a history of twisting the words of the Union supporters he is constantly trying to discredit. Case in point, the post he quoted (and has twisted) was a general discussion of the pay differences between the majors and the regionals, and between the PICs and SICs at NJA at that time. There was nothing in it to justify the warped version he has posted on this thread and another one, as a direct comparison will show:

My post: I definitely agree, and experienced this firsthand when my husband was laid off from AA right after 9-11. He declined to go into the Eagle side of the airline not only because of the lower pay but also because he was hearing that the Eagle pilots didn't want the regular AA guys there--too many hard feelings over the wide pay gap. We understood that. Flying is flying---are you any more careful when you have 100 passengers as opposed to 10? ... The wide pay disparity between FOs and Captains disturbs me as well, esp at NJets where the FO is typed as a Cpt, too. I, too, think that it would be good for all pilots across the board, if the gaps in pay were narrowed. Without a doubt, it would be much better for all the wives and children out there!

B19's warped rewrite of history from post #59 on the 1st Qtr Results--NJ thread: NJW openly stated that her husband bailed out of AMR when they didn't like what the union did there when they were low on the seniority list. Now that they are safe and high on the list it's easy for her to go ahead and give her rhetoric because they can't be touched. If they were low on the list today and in danger of being screwed like what the union was doing to them at AMR, you can bet your butt that she wouldn't be quite so loving of the union life. After all, they bailed last time.. so it's clear she speaks from both sides of her mouth.

HA!!! That post was from 2004, my 27th!! I've been speaking out about the affect of management decisions on the wives and children of pilots --clearly and consistently for 6 years! I'll put my track record for open, honest posting up against B19's any day. For example, is he or isn't he still in management at Avantair? Ask him and standby for more tap-dancing...;)

In short, if you value fairness and accurate posting, don't believe anything B19 posts about me or my husband. Or any other Union supporter, for that matter. As many have noticed, he has an apparent hatred/obsession where Unions are concerned. :erm:

I will now be placing him back on my ignore list. I had only taken the word-twister off of it to do the research required to demonstrate that I had accurately reported his connection to Avantair. I fully support my fellow FI members who have called for a boycott on reading B19's posts because of his typical and obviously (to us) unethical behavior you see demonstrated in this thread. NJW

Their families and their profession are better off when pilots have a seat at the table.....
Please give that careful consideration.
 
Actually, I think it's even more important to have your pay, schedule, benefits, etc protected during bad economic times when management may be even more tempted to do the easy thing and just slash those. Under the demand of trying to balance competing interests, management will not be considering things from the pilotgroup's perspective first...:erm: At times like that you are very lucky to have a legally binding contract speaking for you.

Best wishes to the FltOps pilots and families,
NJW

Really, sounds like a company other than Avantair where there was no furlough, FO,s got a pay raise and we all just got stock options and from what I hear there is more good news on the horizon. Thanks for your trust worthy insight though. Go back to your love affair with b19 now. By the way it does appear that he caught you in a lie. The fact that you wrote two novels on different threads just shows you know you got busted
 
...Thus, I can well appreciate the Avantair group's desire to distance themselves from one as seemingly unbalanced and dishonest as B19, who has identified himself as being a member of the inner circle at Avantair....

This statement is present tense. The thread you brought forward was from 2006, four years ago. As has been pointed out to you, exactly two members of the current management team at Avantair date from that time. Do you have information about his present place of employment that I don't have? No? You know that you demand accurate statements from others, or you call them on it. Hypocrisy, or oversight? I'm curious. Please respond.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top