Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Wright Flyer reenactment

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Chunk

SkyFuzz
Joined
Nov 25, 2001
Posts
496
Well, the cable news networks gave a whole 2 minutes of coverage and immediately cut away once the reenactment failed to get aloft. They spoke of how 'disappointing' it was. I found it to be proof of how amazing the Wright Brothers were. 100 years later, we still can't match their performance, at least not easily.

Way to go Wilbur. Good on ya, Orville.
 
It looked like he rotated, but the engine died. It's extremely wet and you could see the water on the track get pushed out of the way.

I hope they try again.
 
They needed at least 10 knots of wind to help them get airborne. They had that at the start but as he rolled down the track, the wind died down to 6-7 knots and we now know the end result. Let's hope they try again and the winds cooperate this time!
 
Re-Enactment of Wright Bros. Flight Fails



By WILLIAM L. HOLMES, Associated Press Writer

KILL DEVIL HILLS, N.C. - A 100th-anniversary attempt to re-create the Wright brothers' first flight flopped Wednesday when a delicate, wood-and-muslin replica of their airplane failed to get off the ground and splashed into a mud puddle.



On a rainy day when the winds on North Carolina's Outer Banks were uncharacteristically calm, a team of engineers tinkered with the plane and waited for the breeze to pick up before they finally gave up trying to match the feat of the two self-educated bicycle mechanics from Dayton, Ohio.


"Well, if this were easy, I guess everyone would do it," said Tom Poberenzy, president of the Experimental Aircraft Association, a group of aviation enthusiasts that had a hand in building the painstakingly accurate reproduction.


In what was supposed to have been the climax of a six-day celebration of the historic Dec. 17, 1903, flight, the rickety flyer roared its engine and began the slow crawl down its 200-foot wooden launching track before flopping unceremoniously into a puddle in the sand.


The plane, meticulously created at a cost of $1.2 million, twisted awkwardly before stopping with its right wing pushed into the sand, leaving a snapped crosswire and broken fitting.


As a crowd estimated at 35,000 groaned, pilot Kevin Kochersberger dropped his head in apparent embarrassment, tempered only slightly by the fact that President Bush (news - web sites), who had spoken at the anniversary festivities earlier in the day, had already left and was not on hand to see it.


About three hours later, after repairs to the engine and front wing assembly, organizers rolled the plane out to its runway to wait for the rain to ease and the winds to pick up.


Using a crew of Wright ancestors and descendants of the locals to help move the plane into position, Kochersberger, wearing a crash helmet and 1903-era necktie, lay prone with his hands on the controls, waiting for a gust of wind that never came. Kochersberger shrugged with resignation as the team called it quits and let the engine sputter to a stop.


There were no immediate plans to fly the plane on another day. The craft, financed by the Ford Motor Co., is scheduled to join the collection of the Ford Museum in Dearborn, Mich.


The reproduction — 605 pounds, with authentic spruce ribs and a wingspan of 40 feet — matched the brothers' work down the thread count of the muslin covering its wings (news - web sites), and the frustration it produced was also historically accurate.


Orville and Wilbur Wright crashed their flyer at least once before pulling off their successful flight at Kill Devil Hills, not far from Kitty Hawk. The contraption they built in their bicycle workshop back in Ohio took flight four times that day; the first lasted 12 seconds, the final one was 59 seconds long and covered 852 feet.


The re-enactors had planned for years to launch the airplane at 10:35 a.m., 100 years to the minute from when the Wrights first ascended into the skies under motored power. That plan was scrapped not only because of the drenching, scattered rains, but also because winds on the normally breezy Outer Banks dipped below the minimum 10 mph needed.


Bush arrived by helicopter at the Wright Brothers National Memorial and assured the shivering crowd that a touch of bad weather had not stopped the Wright brothers.


"On the day they did fly, just like today, the conditions were not ideal," Bush said. "The Wright brothers hit some disappointments along the way.


"There must have been times when they had to fight their own doubts," he said. "They pressed on, believing in the great work they had begun and in their own capacity to see it though. We would not know their names today if these men had been pessimists."


As Bush's departing Air Force One passed over the memorial, it dipped its right wing, as if in salute.





capt.ncbj11312172025.first_flight_ncbj113.jpg
 
What a big time "flop". You would think they could have done a little better with as much time as they had to prepare.

3 5 0
 
I think the idea was to recreate the original flight using the same technology the Wright brothers had available, not to do "better".

I agree with Chunk, it shows how amazing a feat it was 100 years ago.
 
Tom Brokaw's so fukcing funny. He said they even managed to lose the luggage on the flight. Stick to your day job Tom. :rolleyes:

I think I know why they landed short though...did you see the size of the pilot's watch? It was huge, and obviously weighed them down.
 
Last edited:
Utah State University recreated the Wright Flyer using modern composite materials. They've flown it at my airport a couple times. Very cool, but looks like pure hell to fly the thing. Would have been nice to see both fly there.
 
A "flop"? Hardly. The painstaking, diligent research and hard work that went into the reproduction is mind-boggling. The original only flew four times before it crashed, and these airplanes are IDENTICAL. The Wrights chose Kitty Hawk for the winds and today there weren't any. It'll fly. It very well may crash, but how cool that Ken Hyde and his minions did this at all.

There was so much heritage and facts about the brothers and their discoveries previously unknown and lost to history that are now part of our collective aeronautical knowledge and experience thanks to the Wright Experience. Flop? Come on dude, you're a pilot, look past the mud puddle here.

Cheers!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top