Do you read any of the articles I post on here? I don't make them up, and you are free to post your own if you find them. Most say that DL/NWA would pass the regulator muster before a DL/UAL would, unless there was MAJOR sell off. No thanks, we would rather keep as much as we can. All of the analysts (and not Gordon Bafoon who is paid by Pardus Capital to promote a DL/UA tieup) think the better choice is DL and NWA. Think World Domination with less debt and overlap. Will AF and KLM benefit? Sure they will. Will AF tell us where to put RJs? Um, no? It will be a good investment for them, since the dollar is so weak. It is like a half off sale. Hey, they are timing the market just right....
And, they only get 25% of the voting rights. That's it.
Bye Bye--General Lee
"Borrow Slots", you crack me up.
You let your neighbor borrow your lawn mower, you don't borrow assets that are worth 10's of millions. The CEO of AF would get fired (heck, any airline CEO would deserve to get fired for just letting somebody "borrow" LHR slots, "for free". Get real.
Less debt? As of today UAL has a lower market cap then NWA does.
Less regulatory issues, stop drinking the kool aide. Use your head. MSP, DTW and MEM will fight like hell because they all stand to lose big time. The folks in ORD and SFO could care less because they know if DAL doesn't want the gates and slots someone else will. Denver, knows that they have more to offer then SLC so they won't put up a fight either.
Now this is the best part:
"And, they only get 25% of the voting rights. That's it."
You write a lot of stupid things but this takes the cake, you are actually in favor and think that giving away 25% of the control of your airline to a competing foreign carrier is somehow a good thing. IT'S NOT!
Learn to quit while you are way behind.
Last edited: