NYRANGERS
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2002
- Posts
- 592
Re: 1900
This is BS. This was an obvious ploy by management to change the U PWA. I believe Mesa is getting a permitted type (ie. a true 70 seater). U management wanted to take seats out of bigger planes and fly them at companies with lower rates.
My understanding is that U management is honoring the contract by changing their order. In turn they are "punishing" the W/O and mainline pilots by giving aircraft (they could have given to the W/O's) to mesa.
Another brilliant ploy to whipsaw the mainline and W/O pilots. And you guys are playing right into it. Real nice.
NYR
Wondering at what point regional guys will support mainline guys trying to get management to honor their contracts?
Tim47SIP said:OK I'll bite,
They drew the line at 70 seaters, not 75 seat jets. They are merely trying to protect their profession.
So exactly how is allowing contract carriers to fly up to 70 seats but not the WO's? That looks like pure and simple "We are in charge, and you get what we give you" bullying tactics to me!. Personally, I think mainline U screwed the pooch AGAIN on this one. They have an agenda, and if things around them dont conform, they will just stick their heads in the sand untill it goes away. YeP! they shure showed the company who was boss on this one!
This is BS. This was an obvious ploy by management to change the U PWA. I believe Mesa is getting a permitted type (ie. a true 70 seater). U management wanted to take seats out of bigger planes and fly them at companies with lower rates.
My understanding is that U management is honoring the contract by changing their order. In turn they are "punishing" the W/O and mainline pilots by giving aircraft (they could have given to the W/O's) to mesa.
Another brilliant ploy to whipsaw the mainline and W/O pilots. And you guys are playing right into it. Real nice.
NYR
Wondering at what point regional guys will support mainline guys trying to get management to honor their contracts?