Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Turkish Airlines disputes crash inquiry findings on stall recovery

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I try.. some on the boards thinl I am a mean ol moderator stuck on a power trip... nothing could be further from that idea..
 
I'm not a Boeing guy, but I do find a couple of things interesting about the design...

1. the auto-throttle system is biased to listen to a single radar-altimeter when the two units on board disagree.

2. the auto-throttle system does not respect the stick-shaker or actual stall in the configuration they were in.
 
I am a Boeing guy, and I find a couple of things interesting about the crew...
1. They failed to scan the FMA to see which of the ap/at modes were engaged. They should have noticed that FLARE was engaged prior to g/s intercept.
2. Neither of the crew scanned their flight instruments during final approach and failed to notice the speed falling below their selected Vref speed. The third set of eyes in the cockpit jumpseat failed to notice this too.
3. All the 121 airlines I've worked for have trained me to have my hands on the yoke and on the thrust levers all the way down an instrument approach while the autopilot is on so that I am ready to take control of the aircraft if either the auto pilot or auto thrust system fails at any time.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top