Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

TSA Agent whacks boss over small **** jokes

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

~~~^~~~

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 21, 2001
Posts
6,137
Yeah, really.

One worker is now in jail after assaulting a co-worker who teased him about his small genitalia

Rolando Negrin, 44, had a pretty good life including a steady job with the Transportation Security Administration. However, when he stepped into a full body scanner during a training session and it revealed him to have rather small genitalia, he quickly became the butt of his supervisor's jokes.

Filled with rage at the insults to his manhood, Negrin confronted his boss in the airport parking lot, armed with a police baton. He struck the man on the arm and back. A police report describes, "[Negrin] then told victim to kneel down and say 'your sorry'. Victim stated he was in fear and complied with [Negrin]."

Surprisingly, Negrin made no attempt to flee following the attack. He showed up at work the next day, acting as if nothing had happened. He was promptly arrested. He was booked into the Miami-Dade jail. He was wearing his blue TSA shirt at the time of his arrest.

The incident raises serious questions about the full body scanners that the Obama administrationis looking to spend millions of dollars in taxpayer money to roll out at airports across the country.

Homeland Security and TSA officials, as well as the scanner manufacturers have previously claimed that the scanners blur private parts. The incident clearly indicates that if these capabilities are present, they aren't on in at least some of the scanners -- a serious privacy concern.

Beyond the privacy concerns, there's also concern over the efficacy of the new scanners. British experts say that the scanners are virtually useless at detecting low density substances like chemical powders or liquids, and would be unlikely to detect plastic weapons.

Despite these concerns the U.S. and British governments are charging ahead with plans to roll out the controversial devices. It looks likely that the U.S. may soon implement a no-scan-no-fly policy, much like Britain.
 
Is this an actual news story out of some paper? Wtf? Don't you have to know how to spell to be a reporter? 'your sorry' ????
 
Don't you have to know how to spell to be a reporter? 'your sorry' ????

Normally, i'd say yes, BUT I often read the "Local Paper's" online articles and the "Spelling Police" hammer them daily on typo's and grammatical errors, they are usually corrected as the day goes own...Not sure if the writer get's story posted before they are proofread OR they just don't understand basic grammar or English, BUT the same spelling police that partol FI are apparently elsewhere! Or it's easier for the idiot reporter to let someone' else correct their errors!
KBB
 
From the physical description,the TSA guy must be related to Luckytohaveajob
 
Last edited:
Sorry qt- but how do you know? (!)
And what happened to your cute girl with the perky boobs? Law school's not making you boring is it? ;-)
 

Latest resources

Back
Top