lowecur
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2003
- Posts
- 2,317
I have seen a number of ranges batted around from the original 2400NM to the 2200NM more recently posted on the website. Mr. Neeleman in his latest speech referred to 2100NM. In the certification process, don't they have to justify the numbers they are posting? It may change over the next 18 months. I still think the a/c should have plenty of range for the DTW to SFO route, but actual numbers should be revealed before certification. I know the 170 was reduced from 2100NM to 2000NM before certification.JayDub said:I just spoke with some guys on our EMB-190 team the other day. They don't believe the numbers Embraer is publishing on range. It may get that far to dry tanks, but it has yet to be seen if it will have that for usable range.
What's the range on the 320? I think your longest route is BOS to LGB. That's around 2250NM. I believe Airbus publishes around 2600NM range. Have any of the flights ever had to stop for fuel because of headwinds?
Last edited: