Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Something's not quite right here

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
haha!! SWEET!

I like how the radar altimeter still reads 200 INVERTED. Lol
 
Im running netscape. No problems at all.

Might be firefox
 
fr0g said:
haha!! SWEET!

I like how the radar altimeter still reads 200 INVERTED. Lol

I'm not sure where the radar altimeter TX/RC is mounted on the real plane, maybe it would read the same way.
 
Last edited:
Hey, I can do that too, see?
(Radio altimeter's wrong here too... MSFS never gets anything right.)
http://www.lunar-tokyo.net/~dseagrav/742inv1.jpg

You can't see the runway though because even at insane speed that takes a lot of back pressure. There's no way I could do this during an approach.
http://www.lunar-tokyo.net/~dseagrav/742inv2.jpg

The passengers would probably object to this too, but it's Braniff, so I don't have to care.
http://www.lunar-tokyo.net/~dseagrav/742inv3.jpg

I could try this with the A320 but protection won't let me roll the airplane that far, and forcing direct law is cheating.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top