Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

More ACA/Mesa news

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

UALX727

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 26, 2001
Posts
234
Press Release Source: Atlantic Coast Airlines Holdings, Inc.


ACA Files Complaint Against Mesa Air Group
Tuesday October 28, 7:45 am ET
Alleges United Airlines is Undisclosed Backer of Mesa's Consent Solicitation


DULLES, Va., Oct. 28 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Atlantic Coast Airlines Holdings, Inc. ("ACA" or the "Company") (Nasdaq: ACAI - News) announced today that it has filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia alleging that Mesa Air Group, Inc. ("Mesa") (Nasdaq: MESA - News) has made materially false and misleading statements and omissions in violation of federal securities laws in connection with its proposed consent solicitation and potential exchange offer. ACA is seeking from the Court, among other things, an order: requiring Mesa to correct its material misstatements and omissions; enjoining Mesa from disseminating its false and misleading proposed consent solicitation; and enjoining Mesa from making an exchange offer to ACA's stockholders. Among other things, ACA alleges that Mesa has failed to identify United Airlines, Inc. ("United") as a participant in the consent solicitation and in Mesa's proposed transaction, and also has omitted material information from its consent solicitation regarding (i) Mesa's financial position and its reason for proposing to acquire ACA; (ii) questionable trading in Mesa stock by Mesa's chairman and chief executive officer and other Mesa insiders shortly before the announcement of Mesa's takeover proposal; (iii) the inappropriate short-swing trades in which Mesa insiders have engaged; (iv) the self-dealing and lack of independence of Mesa's directors; and (v) the lack of independence of several of Mesa's nominees to ACA's Board of Directors.
More specifically, ACA's complaint alleges, among other things, that Mesa failed to disclose:

* That United is a participant in Mesa's consent solicitation and proposed
transaction. ACA alleges that Mesa's proposed plan to acquire all of
the outstanding shares of ACA's common stock is nothing more than an
attempt by Mesa and its undisclosed backer, United, to (i) prevent ACA
from establishing an economically viable, low-fare, low-cost airline
based at Washington Dulles International Airport that would compete
directly against United and Mesa and (ii) eliminate the significant
hurdle to United's efforts to emerge from bankruptcy that has resulted
from its inability to negotiate an agreement for ACA to continue
operating United Express for United.

On a conference call with securities analysts on October 7, 2003,
Jonathan Ornstein, Mesa's chairman and chief executive officer,
acknowledged contacting United prior to making its expression of
interest to the ACA Board:

"We are partnered with United Airlines. When we announced that we
had discussed it [Mesa's proposed acquisition of ACA] with United,
United has [sic] reaffirmed the fact to us that they would like to
come to an agreement with Atlantic [C]oast, they [sic] would like to
maintain that Atlantic [C]oast has a feed operation and to the
extent [sic] that we could be involved in that decision it would be
helpful."

* That Mesa is having problems financing additional aircraft purchases, a
cornerstone of its growth plans. Mr. Ornstein has conceded, "Mesa's
biggest challenge ... has been our ability to finance new aircraft."
ACA believes that Mesa is seeking control of ACA so that Mesa can gain
the use of ACA's cash on hand, which is expected to reach over $200
million by year end. Mesa's desire to acquire ACA so it can use the
Company's cash to resolve Mesa's own financial difficulties is material
information that should have been disclosed to stockholders and the
market.

* That Ornstein and other Mesa insiders sold a substantial number of Mesa
shares in September 2003, shortly before Mesa announced its takeover
attempt of ACA. These sales of Mesa shares by Mesa's directors just
prior to the announcement of Mesa's proposed transaction involving ACA
are in contrast to their ebullient view of Mesa's future, the prospects
for a successful merger with ACA, and the advantages of such a merger
asserted in Mesa public statements.

* That other questionable insider transactions produced short-swing
profits subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act, which requires a
corporate insider to disgorge any profit from a purchase and sale (or
sale and purchase) of any equity security of the issuer within any
period that is less than six months.

* The self-dealing and lack of independence of Mesa's directors, who have
determined that an acquisition of ACA would be in Mesa's best interest
and are proposing a transaction in which the stockholders of ACA would
receive shares of Mesa common stock. Seven of Mesa's nine directors
have had, and ACA believes, continue to have, outside business
relationships with Mesa, including highly lucrative consulting
contracts, which compromise their independence and judgment. This
information is material to the ACA stockholders because Mesa's proposed
transaction would result in ACA stockholders exchanging their ACA common
stock for Mesa common stock.

* That several of Mesa's nominees to ACA's Board of Directors suffer
conflicts of interest that would impair their ability to fulfill their
fiduciary obligations to ACA.


On October 23, 2003, ACA announced that its Board of Directors had unanimously reaffirmed the Company's previously announced strategy to establish a new, independent low-fare airline and decided not to pursue Mesa's expression of interest to acquire all outstanding shares of ACA. In making its determination, the Board noted that, among other things, Mesa's expression of interest is highly conditional and subject to due diligence. The Board believes that the Company's current plan provides better value for ACA stockholders.

ACA currently operates as United Express and Delta Connection in the Eastern and Midwestern United States as well as Canada. On July 28, 2003, ACA announced plans to establish a new, independent low-fare airline to be based at Washington Dulles International Airport. The Company has a fleet of 146 aircraft-including a total of 118 regional jets-and offers over 840 daily departures, serving 84 destinations. ACA employs over 4,800 aviation professionals.
 
Way to go ACA !!! Let's shine the light on Orenstein and his minions and expose them for what they really are, the Frank Lorenzos of the new millenium. Hope it serves to keep you guys
(and gals ! ) out of his reach.


PHXFLYR:cool:
 
I really would like to see ACA become the next AirTran or Jetblue - it could happen (despite what some analysts had to say - they all thought AirTran was doomed at one point or another).

JO is a snake - everyone knows that... If ACA gets swallowed by Mesa, all ACA pilots can look forward to ZERO raises in the future.
 
Throw all the stones at Mesa you want, but UAL is the one calling the shots. JO is just a puppet on a string.
 
Pretty serious allegations. Thanks for posting this thread.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top