Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

MESA -200s for UAL...TOAST

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Sorry, you are wrong. These provisions are not enforcable and have no connection whatsoever to safety standards. Many airlines have filed for BK protection very few have ever had safety issues.

Bottom line is this. IF Mesa files for BK they can restructure under the protection of the court. Depends on the type of bankruptcy filed and whether the judge ascertains whether the entity is a viable on-going concern that, should it survive, can have a reasonable chance of paying off creditors--otherwise, it's Chapter 7 Liquidation. Limited or no revenue streams = non viable entity

That same court will never allow Delta or any other customer to cancel the contract. This is a matter of law. It has already been tested is many courts. This clause is simply unenforcable.
You are pulling this one out of your arse! Most contracts contain an escape clause for mutual protection that gives contractual relief should either party become insolvent or in a financial condition that impacts the party's duties and the ability to perform those duties as prescribed in the contract. No contract or judge would legally bind a party to a boat anchor. A contract really means nothing--paper with words. It only means something when there is a dispute, major or minor, when one or the other party falls short of fullfilling it's duties, and the contractual terms and meaning is interpretated by a 3rd party.

I'm just guessing--but I would think, in this case, that the larger company has a larger artillery and or armada in the form of legal council plus DEEP pockets to wage a successful legal battle--most often called "Staying Power!"

Mesa will survive and flourish

Survive--maybe in the Bastions of China or Hawaii, but in small force. Even La CockaRoaches survive.

Flourish--to grow luxuriantly : thrive-- No Maas, Notta, Nil, or "Turn Out the Light, the Party's Over!" Even Frank Lorenzo was put out to pasture. Ba-Bye!
 
Sorry, you are wrong. These provisions are not enforcable and have no connection whatsoever to safety standards. Many airlines have filed for BK protection very few have ever had safety issues.

Bottom line is this. IF Mesa files for BK they can restructure under the protection of the court. That same court will never allow Delta or any other customer to cancel the contract. This is a matter of law. It has already been tested is many courts. This clause is simply unenforcable.

Mesa will survive and flourish

So you are saying these provisions that were explicitly written into Mesa's service agreement for this exact circumstance were just in there take up space? Hows it feel to think you are smarter on the subject of bankruptcy than all the lawyers that assembled this contract?
 
Sure they can. BK only gets you off the hook with your VENDORS and CREDITORS. It's a one-way street.
Pardna, those rules changed right after NWA and Delta filed for Bankruptcy--the coming change in laws was the causal effect of their bankruptcy. Under new laws, no one gets off the hook. The liability and duty to pay still remains for the whole amount. Now, terms may change, if the new type of Bankruptcy is ordered by the court. If they owe you a $100, they will still owe you a $100--no discounting or cancelling is allowed. Thank those changes to the Banking Industry and their Lobbyists.

It cannot force your CUSTOMERS to keep using you...especially if their contract specifically lets them off the hook if you file BK. It's a reasonable contractual provision since a BK regional airline cannot be expected to maintain safety standards.

?????whatcha mean, Verne???? Customers, in the loose sense, are never legally bound in a business relationship. Free to Come, Free to Go! However, if 2 parties enter into a contractual relationship, then that is a different situatation. But, I think I know what you be saying, and I'm down with it! Your safety standards argument is a huge issue in these matters, because it involves Government regulation, in addition to public and media perception. In this matter, from an FAA perspective, if Major Airline D contracts with Minor airline M, Minor airline M has to not only comply with it's own ceritifying requirements, but it also has to operate and meet most if not all requirements of Major Airline D, except those where differences are prescribed by regulation. Initial Certification as well On-going ceritification requirements are governed by "Fiscal Fitness Standards" that are regulated to certain high standards, and cannot be compromised without putting Certification at risk. Most of the time, when airlines start having known financial problems, they go on a "watch list" and all practices, especially Maintenance, come under more scrutinty and oversight by the FAA to make sure that Certification standards in all areas are still met.
 
Last edited:
Bottom line is this. IF Mesa files for BK they can restructure under the protection of the court. That same court will never allow Delta or any other customer to cancel the contract. This is a matter of law. It has already been tested is many courts. This clause is simply unenforcable.

Mesa will survive and flourish

I can tell you for a fact that you are absolutely 100% wrong. The day that Mesa files, the Delta contract will be canceled and there is absolutely NO legal recourse Mesa has to prevent this.
 
They were only required by Oct 31st to provide UAL expected delivery dates of the additional 700s. Who is to say that hasn't happened?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top