Found on Mesalounge.
"Having considered all the materials submitted, the entire record in this matter, the demeanor and credibility of the testimony of the witnesses, the court will grant a preliminary injuction enjoining Mesa from proceeding with the consent solicitation or exchange offer until this matter can be heard and decided on by its merits. The defendants motion to dismiss will be denied without prejudice. A confirming order will be issued."
"It is more troubling that Mesa has provided such limited disclosure concerning the financial
benefits to Mesa under the United MOU."
"The Court concludes that Atlantic Coast has
demonstrated an antitrust injury with respect to its claim under § 1 of the Sherman Act and D.C. Code
§ 28-4502."
"Mesa had no answer to the Court’s question as to why Atlantic Coast did not have
standing as a potential competitor, even if not as a target, and the Court deems the issue almost
conceded."
"They do not demonstrate why it would be in Mesa’s corporate self-interest to have Atlantic Coast remain a UAX carrier. It would appear more logical for Mesa to try to supplant
Atlantic Coast as a favored UAX carrier than to retain it."
"The Court
concludes that Atlantic Coast has a significant likelihood of success at proving the existence of
concerted action with the effect of restraining a potential competitor."
http://www.atlanticcoast.com/NonFlash/other/other_NF.html
"Having considered all the materials submitted, the entire record in this matter, the demeanor and credibility of the testimony of the witnesses, the court will grant a preliminary injuction enjoining Mesa from proceeding with the consent solicitation or exchange offer until this matter can be heard and decided on by its merits. The defendants motion to dismiss will be denied without prejudice. A confirming order will be issued."
"It is more troubling that Mesa has provided such limited disclosure concerning the financial
benefits to Mesa under the United MOU."
"The Court concludes that Atlantic Coast has
demonstrated an antitrust injury with respect to its claim under § 1 of the Sherman Act and D.C. Code
§ 28-4502."
"Mesa had no answer to the Court’s question as to why Atlantic Coast did not have
standing as a potential competitor, even if not as a target, and the Court deems the issue almost
conceded."
"They do not demonstrate why it would be in Mesa’s corporate self-interest to have Atlantic Coast remain a UAX carrier. It would appear more logical for Mesa to try to supplant
Atlantic Coast as a favored UAX carrier than to retain it."
"The Court
concludes that Atlantic Coast has a significant likelihood of success at proving the existence of
concerted action with the effect of restraining a potential competitor."
http://www.atlanticcoast.com/NonFlash/other/other_NF.html