Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Grow Baby GROW! WN/AAI

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
SWA could hit the smaller markets with the B717, without having a contract regional.

OK, but to do that, the pilots of the smaller 717 need to be paid less than the larger 737. Are the 737 boys at LUV going to agree to a lower pay scale to fly the 717?
 
Pilots per aircraft has had a historically low variance at SWA. While there's certain to be an adjustment, I doubt it the new ratio will trump the gold standard of aircraft on property.

Another thing you're forgetting: pilots per aircraft will probably decrease quite a few point on the AAI side once the CBAs are merged. Decrease in pilots-per-aircraft is shrinkage (Yes, I said "shrinkage"!). When I saw a recent AAI seniority list, I was AMAZED at the number of folks out on Military. Let's face it, a lot of AAI FOs are on extended military deployment because the pay and bennies are MUCH better with Uncle Sam.
 
So.....no increase in pay to fly the larger -800's, it wouldn't seem logical to pay less for the smaller 717 ( maybe 122 seats).
 
OK, but to do that, the pilots of the smaller 717 need to be paid less than the larger 737. Are the 737 boys at LUV going to agree to a lower pay scale to fly the 717?

One thing to keep in mind is that the 717 in all coach class has just as many seats as the 737-500's. Will you propose a lower rate for the 500's as well.
 
Relax Francis,
I am just pointing out that the 717 may not be so great if you have to pay the crews more to operate them. Pay has historically been tied to aircraft size. At Alaska, the pilots across the board got a raise when the -900 was introduced. I guess LUV is not going to follow that logic.

If a 717 in all coach class truly seats as many as the 737-500 then why even operate the 717 fleet? If it is the same size, How is this a better tool to serve the smaller markets?
 
Last edited:
If you see a coyote in the alley behind your house, throw him a slice of pizza. That might just save your neighbor's loudazz poodle that is stuck outside every night. See ya!


Bye Bye--General Lee


"Now that's funny right there. I don't care who you are! That's some funny Sh!!t."
 
relax francis,
i am just pointing out that the 717 may not be so great if you have to pay the crews more to operate them. Pay has historically been tied to aircraft size. At alaska, the pilots across the board got a raise when the -900 was introduced. I guess luv is not going to follow that logic.

If a 717 in all coach class truly seats as many as the 737-500 then why even operate the 717 fleet? If it is the same size, how is this a better tool to serve the smaller markets?

we are a high frequency point to point airline. It will work just fine.
 
no..

Relax Francis,
I am just pointing out that the 717 may not be so great if you have to pay the crews more to operate them. Pay has historically been tied to aircraft size. At Alaska, the pilots across the board got a raise when the -900 was introduced. I guess LUV is not going to follow that logic.

SWA has already agreed to a pay bump across the board for all pilots to allow the -800 to fly or to convert the existing orders to the 175-seat jet.

If a 717 in all coach class truly seats as many as the 737-500 then why even operate the 717 fleet? If it is the same size, How is this a better tool to serve the smaller markets?

The 717 is more efficient than the 737 and should be cheaper to operate, unless the MX costs get out of hand with parts. Pilot wages are just a small part of the cost equation. I saw some of the SWA projections with the larger 737 and the acquisition of AAI. Their projections put SWA as the second lowest cost operator.

SWA and SWAPA will play it smart and keep one pay rate for all equipment. It is a win/win for all parties.
 
And what do you think the likely growth scenario was in terms of "organic growth"? Factor in retirements... and I can assure you are going to have a greatly enhanced QOL in every facet of your career. Who knows someday may even be able to guy GL a brew in Nigeria. On second thought...
 

Latest resources

Back
Top