Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Far 25.111

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
GVFlyer said:
It's got to be an educational experience flying an airplane where at night, you set the mixture control on the 4 Pratt & Whitney R-2800's by looking at the 18 foot flame pattern they generate.

GV

Actually, we set the mixture control by reference to the torquemters. In the DC-6 you can't see the exhaust flames, all the exhaust stacks are on the outboard sides of the nacelles. Douglas did it that way specifically so that the passengers couldn't see "flames coming out of the engines" which made then nervous. It requires a more complicated exhaust system but Douglas figures it was worth it if passengers felt safer flying a DC-6. That philosophy was abandoned with the DC-7 as it would be almost impossibe (or at least very difficult) to route the overboard stacks from all 3 Power Recovery Turbines on the R-3350 to the outboard side.

You can see the exhaust flame on the C-46 at night, and it is truly an impressive sight.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top