Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Condi Rice

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I think the Chelsea comments were simply reworked Amy Carter comments.

And those came from democrats....
 
Typhoon1244 said:
I will say this though: those Democrats were slandering an adult. They generally avoid ridiculing children in the national media.

Republicans can't make the same claim. Just ask Chelsea.

Are you talking about the Limbaugh flap?
 
It cuts both ways.

Those of you trashing the 'pubs generally over comments by a few about Chelsea Clinton or Amy Carter have very short memories...

What about the stories and swipes at Bush's daughters about a year and a half ago?

Or more recently, the attacks on Cheney's daughter for supporting her dad coming from the homosexual community (one of Cheney's daughters is lesbian).

Lots of dems play dirty.
 
Last edited:
If I every (sic) marry a woman as beautiful and intelligent...
She'd teach you proper grammar.

She's a bagger, but I'd hit it ... and I'd vote for her over Hillary any day. Hillary Clinton gives me the heebie-jeebies.

:eek:

Minh
 
I vote for issues. Not personality.

And this is the problem with American elections.

A person's success is determined by their telegenicity (to coin a phrase).

Ever since Kennedy chose to wear make-up and Nixon didn't we have been doomed to elect the guy (or gal) that just seems to "portray themself better."

Look at Reagan.
And Bush Sr. (vs. Dukakis in the tank with the helmet)
And Clinton

And even Bush Jr. for all of his verbal gaffes seemed more human than the robotic and monotone Gore.

And so, we get what we vote for don't we?

All image. No substance.
All spin. All the time.

Where's the beef?
 
Good thought Mar.

I agree, it's symbolism over substance. To quote one of the best shows ever made (The Simpsons).

JFK - "Helen, I hope you don't mind if I reply with yet another flip remark"
Press corp - "Ah, hahahahaha."
 
Re: Condi Vs Hillary

Emerson Bigguns said:
If you had to choose between the two in 2008(or anytime)..... Condi hands down IMHO.


www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/ricebio.html[/URL]

Vs

www.whitehouse.gov/history/firstladies/hc42.html[/URL]

Hillary's worst nightmare:

1. Cheney resigns for health reasons and Condi Rice goes on the ticket in November. This would also be Kerry's worst nightmare.

2. Bush / Cheney are re-elected in November, Cheney resigns before the inauguration, and Condi Rice is appointed to replace him.

Dare I hope?
 
Snakum said:
She'd teach you proper grammar.

She's a bagger, but I'd hit it ... and I'd vote for her over Hillary any day. Hillary Clinton gives me the heebie-jeebies.

:eek:

Minh

I haven't decided if Condi's a bagger or not, but Hillary is definitely an Oklahoma two bagger. One for her, and one for you in case her's rips off.

Man, I need to stop spending time on the computer. :D
enigma
 

Latest resources

Back
Top