Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Army Warrant Officer advice please

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
If you look on the first page of this thread you will see where I did provide something constructive and a link that this guy could use to get some information. I hope that meets your satisfaction.

I have kids, two of them, and their college is already paid for through hard work, a lot of saving and some good investments. Believe me, I know the importance of saving for education.

One thing you may not have grasped well in your time in the military was clear and concise written communication. If you expect me to assume then you know what will happen next.

I'm all for dropping this and letting this thread continue to help this guy figure out what he needs to do.

Good Luck at NetJets.
 
"As far as your medical goes it is hard for me to understand. I would like to pay as little as you do and I am wondering what kind of plan you have and who it is through. Wouldn't you say it a very large disparity between our plans? Why is it hard for you to understand that maybe others would like to get a low cost plan like this if the coverage was the same? "


I am a Captain at Comair Airlines. My health care is through Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield.

While the payment is low compared to what you pay at NetJets you don't want to be at Comair with our pay and our dwindling, dieing company.
 
Guest Column: Apache Flaws Stem from Doctrine and Tactics

Check this out:



By Maj. Wade Hasle, USMC

Great read. Thanks for the post.

We always hovered, but at NTC a lot of us learned the vlaue of running fire. Of course with the F models, we often had no choice.

Again, a great read. Ah... NVGs vs. FLIR. Brings back memories.
 
"As far as your medical goes it is hard for me to understand. I would like to pay as little as you do and I am wondering what kind of plan you have and who it is through. Wouldn't you say it a very large disparity between our plans? Why is it hard for you to understand that maybe others would like to get a low cost plan like this if the coverage was the same? "


I am a Captain at Comair Airlines. My health care is through Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield.

While the payment is low compared to what you pay at NetJets you don't want to be at Comair with our pay and our dwindling, dieing company.

I'm not even sure who are what your directing your hostility at. BTW I'm ALSO former Comair, along with furloughed NJA.... I paid zero out of pocket for medical while at NJA. Trust me, medical at NJA is much better than Comair. I'm the one who works at NJA, not Cobra.

This all started when I sid I was worried about missing out on six figure income if recalled before my duty was up with the Army. And if you add all the intangibles, I made well over six figures during my first 2 years at NJA. But in year 10+ at NJA my SIC base pay will be over 100K, not including 401k contributions, per diem, tips, etc.
 
If you look on the first page of this thread you will see where I did provide something constructive and a link that this guy could use to get some information. I hope that meets your satisfaction.

I have kids, two of them, and their college is already paid for through hard work, a lot of saving and some good investments. Believe me, I know the importance of saving for education.

One thing you may not have grasped well in your time in the military was clear and concise written communication. If you expect me to assume then you know what will happen next.

I'm all for dropping this and letting this thread continue to help this guy figure out what he needs to do.

Good Luck at NetJets.

I don't work at Net Jets, CRJFlyer does. I just wanted to point out to CRJ that when it comes time to separate their is a lot more to military pay than what is on a pay chart. For example your BAH figure of $941. If a CW2 is stationed in Washington DC BAH is $2355, that means you would get $1614 more than what you listed per month, tax free, but that is a lot to explain. Just as when people ask how much airline pilots make rarely do we say "well I make $30 an hour based on a 72 hour guarantee" even though that is what the pay chart says. Too much to go into.

I saw a lot of guys separate in the airline hiring boom of the late 1990's me included and I heard all the stories about six figure incomes and three year upgrades to Captain. I was fortunate, I stayed in the Reserves and did not take a job at a regional. It was still an eye opener when I saw my first paycheck where I was taxed on the whole amount of my pay, had to (10 years ago) pay around $180 for medical care, had no pension plan, and could only contribute 10% of my Reserve pay into TSP. So to me total compensation is a true gauge of how much you will make, not just numbers on a chart. Sorry if I was not clear.

Actually the point of that post was the intangible benefits of service such as a sense of duty or purpose. I sort of feel I am just chasing a paycheck and don't quite feel the same sense of job satisfaction. Have you experienced something similar?
 
A CW2 .... helo guy .... stationed in Washington DC ? Yeah, that's a good example .... happens almost everyday.

Why don't we through in Astronaut incentive pay for a WO1 / CW2 as long as we are at it (for those qualified)?

$991 was just the 2010 Basic Allowance for Quarters for a W2 with dependants right off the DFAS website. I was just trying to keep it simple and in the middle of the road. It is a good realistic number to use to determine money that may come your way. Of course, if you live on post then this comparison is moot.

If there is perceived hostility in this post I am truly sorry.
 
AirCobra,

I am interested in the date of the article that you posted. Some of the points brought up are valid but things in the 'Gun World' changed drastically after Shah i Kot and the opening of OIF. I have been out of the 'Big Rig' (-64A) for a while and know that TTPs have improved several generations since I 'was there'.

I was around when we moved from the old Fulda Gap hovering fight. Again, talking to the guys in the fight now, things have progressed generations above/better than what we were doing just 6-7 years ago.

I also have HUGE issues with what briganti has written in the past. So much so that I give no credence to what he writes now. I refuse to waste time on his garbage. He certainly has an axe to grind. He is completely biased against the -64A/D and embarrassed himself in the wake of the Albania/Kosovo deal. Anyone that read 'Rotor & Wing' during that time frame may remember the deluge of replies to that magazine rebutting his column and pointing out his errors. I personally know several individuals involved in the operation and they ALL state that the external issues dropped on them were the overriding problem. One aircraft loss may be attributed to a 'training' problem. The other was not.

BTW, off topic... There was a P-39 at Sun and Fun this year. Neat aircraft!
 
Last edited:
Just did some brush up steadying at Barnes and Noble. They had a couple AFAST study guides ( along with other branches flight tests.) Seems like the questions in each study guide were pretty similar. Almost seems like taking a Gleim practice test. You know, when you can pretty much memorize the questions/answers.

Although the cyclical pictures and corresponding answers were way wrong (and thats what alot of the reviews said at the Barnes and Noble website). Unless I don't know what a descending left bank is and how to make a control stick perform it. Other than that it looks pretty straight forward. The pictures for the cyclical movements can look a bit confusing sometimes while trying to figure out exactly what your looking at.

200 questions, best possible score is a 170(ish) and must get atleast a 90 to pass. Looks like it should be fairly easy, although from what I read, the better your score the higher up the list you go. (similar to civil service exams).

Any other input.
Thanks. my AFAST test is Wed. morning.

Also found the medical regulations and corresponding flight requirements online. Most of it is no-brainer stuff that would be obvious DQ criteria. I didn't see any condition that would DQ me. Unless I have amnesia I forgot about!!!
 
Just did some brush up steadying at Barnes and Noble. They had a couple AFAST study guides ( along with other branches flight tests.) Seems like the questions in each study guide were pretty similar. Almost seems like taking a Gleim practice test. You know, when you can pretty much memorize the questions/answers.

Although the cyclical pictures and corresponding answers were way wrong (and thats what alot of the reviews said at the Barnes and Noble website). Unless I don't know what a descending left bank is and how to make a control stick perform it. Other than that it looks pretty straight forward. The pictures for the cyclical movements can look a bit confusing sometimes while trying to figure out exactly what your looking at.

200 questions, best possible score is a 170(ish) and must get atleast a 90 to pass. Looks like it should be fairly easy, although from what I read, the better your score the higher up the list you go. (similar to civil service exams).

Any other input.
Thanks. my AFAST test is Wed. morning.

Also found the medical regulations and corresponding flight requirements online. Most of it is no-brainer stuff that would be obvious DQ criteria. I didn't see any condition that would DQ me. Unless I have amnesia I forgot about!!!

Once again this is something I heard, but once you pass the AFAST, whatever score you get is the score you are stuck with. I remember a post a few years back where a guy got a low passing score (like 110 or something) and wanted to take the test again, but the Army told him no since it takes a 90 to pass, and he got a passing score.

I took all the tests in college and scored the best on the AFOQT. I did the poorest on the NFOQT but my score was good enough for both the Navy and Marine Corps. My AFAST score was middle of the road. I remember a lot of if this gear "A" turns this way and gear "B" turn this way, which way will gear "C" turn to the point of exhaustion. There were also about 5 or 6 helicopter specific questions dealing with the functions of the cyclic, collective, and pedals and maybe some rotor wing aerodynamics. The NFOQT was full of algebra word problems and long division and multiplication and they gave you very little time to do them.
 
AirCobra,

I am interested in the date of the article that you posted. Some of the points brought up are valid but things in the 'Gun World' changed drastically after Shah i Kot and the opening of OIF. I have been out of the 'Big Rig' (-64A) for a while and know that TTPs have improved several generations since I 'was there'.

I was around when we moved from the old Fulda Gap hovering fight. Again, talking to the guys in the fight now, things have progressed generations above/better than what we were doing just 6-7 years ago.

I also have HUGE issues with what briganti has written in the past. So much so that I give no credence to what he writes now. I refuse to waste time on his garbage. He certainly has an axe to grind. He is completely biased against the -64A/D and embarrassed himself in the wake of the Albania/Kosovo deal. Anyone that read 'Rotor & Wing' during that time frame may remember the deluge of replies to that magazine rebutting his column and pointing out his errors. I personally know several individuals involved in the operation and they ALL state that the external issues dropped on them were the overriding problem. One aircraft loss may be attributed to a 'training' problem. The other was not.

BTW, off topic... There was a P-39 at Sun and Fun this year. Neat aircraft!

7-9-2003 was when the Major Hasle's letter appeared in Leatherneck Magazine so the article was probably June 2003 Rotor and Wing. I always wondered about the wisdom of using helicopters for Deep Attack and I though Major Hasle put my exact thoughts into words pretty well. Too bad helo guys don't do exchange tours like Fixed Wing guys do. I think Marine helo pilots could benefit from some time with the Army, and vice versa, especuially guys in the attack helo community.

Interesting story about the P-39. In Guadalcanal Marine Wildcats were doing air to air while AAF P-39's provided CAS for Marines on the ground. Kind of a role reversal from what goes on today. Two AAF P-39's pretty much wiped out an entire Japanese counter attack and probaly saved a regiment of Marines. The Marines who had developed CAS tactics in the 1920's and somehow forgot about them, were reminded how important the airplane could be in winning land battles. The P-39's in Guadalcanal served as the catalyst for training Corsair pilots in CAS which they would later do in Iwo Jima and Okinawa. So to me the P-39 is kind on an honorary Marine airplane, not to mention it was made by Bell who of course makes the AH-1W.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top