Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Pentagon to triple the number of drones

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Geez, I see Rez has spewed his sack over here now. He or she's been owned too many times on the Non-Av board and now he appears to like hanging out with the title 10 guys. One thing you'll find is that you'll waste your time trying to correct Rez's pacifest views. Rez has been outed as an avowed Socialist who frequently cuts and pastes from numerous red web sites and only knows how to answer a question with a question. I believe Rez's identity is also female but that's unconfirmed. At any rate, he/she is a world class baiter and is incapable of learning anything after being schooled. When owned, he/she ducks out, waits, then reappears with new flame-baiting and reels somebody else in into a fruitless discussion. Many on the Non-Av site have resorted to the ignore toggle just to zero it out. You'll get nowhere if you engage. Supreme military-envy suspected at root here.
 
Last edited:
Geez, I see Rez has spewed his sack over here now. He or she's been owned too many times on the Non-Av board and now he appears to like hanging out with the title 10 guys. One thing you'll find is that you'll waste your time trying to correct Rez's pacifest views. Rez has been outed as an avowed Socialist who frequently cuts and pastes from numerous red web sites and only knows how to answer a question with a question. I believe Rez's identity is also female but that's unconfirmed. At any rate, he/she is a world class baiter and is incapable of learning anything after being schooled. When owned, he/she ducks out, waits, then reappears with new flame-baiting and reels somebody else in into a fruitless discussion. Many on the Non-Av site have resorted to the ignore toggle just to zero it out. You'll get nowhere if you engage. Supreme military-envy suspected at root here.
Bored? Why not go to church to find the strength to go bomb some civilians..... am I sure there is scripture you quote that justifies iron bombs raining down on evil doers..... including the five year olds....
 
"Bored? Why not go to church to find the strength to go bomb some civilians..... am I sure there is scripture you quote that justifies iron bombs raining down on evil doers..... including the five year olds...."

People stop paying attention to you and you pull a stunt like this! You really have no shame. I feel sorry for you Rez. You are truly a defective human being...

...and this is coming from a non-church goer.
 
So we don't question.... questionable acts by our own govt? How do we self correct? How do we ensure that what we are doing is proper and moral?.... if we never question......

Your problem is you don't listen to the answers and you do not understand the situation. Sure you present correct facts but they do not convey the entire picture of the reality. The articles you posted did not show the whole picture. Here is an example to convey my point: A paper prints that several men ran into a building and shot 6 people dead including a child. But then you do your homework and find out that the shooters were policeman and they were raiding a house full violent bank robbers who had numerous hostages. The child had a gun and was firing it.

You bring up great topics that need to be discussed but then you disrespect those you are trying to have the discussion with. Just read this thread and see the hostility you instigated. You need to know your audience. You cannot come over to the military forum and call us murderers and expect an honest and clear debate on the issues. There were several ways to intelligently bring up your issues and have a mature discussion but you chose to fan the fire on a delicate situation and piss off JungleJett. JJ has a lot of insight into what is going on and I think if you respectfully engage him I think you might both share a lot in common instead of the thread degeneration we have all read here.
 
Some food for thought.

C40 You say the invasion of Iraq was justified by our elected leaders because they "believed" Saddam had weapons of mass destruction.

Then why have we not invaded North Korea?

They have shown that they now possess weapons grade materials and have detonated an atomic bomb.

They have stock piles of nerve gas and other agents that are the definition of WMD's. Defectors from the North Korean military have given testimony that they tested these chemical weapons on political prisoners.

While we spend blood and treasure in Iraq and Afghanistan millions of people in North Korea suffer under the iron fist of one of the worst governments in the world. So again... Why have we not invaded?

Could it be that North Korea does not have oil?

I'll tell you this much, if the current pressure being put on the Iranian government fails to bring about regime change I guarantee we will use the military option. Royal Dutch Shell and BP have lusted after those oil reserves ever since the Shaw was ousted in the late 70's. But first we will have to get Iraq and Afghanistan out of the news. The sham coalition government in Iraq will be declared a victory and the Afghan people will again be abandoned to their fate after the new gas pipe line is completed from the Caspian.

It may even take another terrorist event (God I hope not!) to jump start this thing. And when that happens will you just carry on business as usual in your basement office in the Pentagon?

Well... I guess no one will have to worry about accountability for war crimes since they set legal president with the Bush memos on torture. All you have to do now is say that you acted under orders.

Nuremberg was for nothing after all...

And the corporate media talking heads kept on... and on....and on......
 
Last edited:
He is actually quite correct.

A foreign policy that dictates we invade every nation that threatens to develop WMDs is both ill advised and completely unworkable.

Even had Iraq possessed WMDs the invasion was a poor strategic decision for the United Stantes.
 
If that was food for thought, I am still hungry. Your rant on conspiracies, evil corporations were amusing as is your ignorance on the N Korea situation.



Ignorance? OK then give me some help. Why have we not invaded North Korea?

Are we afraid of them? Would we be up against the Chinese?

Oil has nothing to do with it? Why not?

Please do not just ignore the questions. Give me your opinion and I may just stand corrected.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top