Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

787 on fire !!!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
787= Epic failure in outsourcing. Margins looked good on paper but can you put a price on quality from real Boeing workers??? Corporate greed...plain and simple and now it's haunting Boeing.
 
787= Epic failure in outsourcing. Margins looked good on paper but can you put a price on quality from real Boeing workers??? Corporate greed...plain and simple and now it's haunting Boeing.

Is the answer really that simple? Or is it more that very cutting edge technology has its risk?
 
Lack of quality from outsourced work. Cost over runs. Improper fittings, delays. Quality issues from foreign providers. Just a mess from the inception of the 787 project. I doubt the 787 will ever be a money maker for Boeing. How many billions has the project over by???. The only thing saving Boeing from a complete company melt-down is the success of the 737 and the military contracts.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/afontev...-sell-for-116m-but-productivity-is-improving/


http://seattletimes.com/html/businesstechnology/2021045270_boeingoutsourcingxml.html
 
Is the answer really that simple? Or is it more that very cutting edge technology has its risk?
Yup, I talked to a senior Boeing executive several months ago. He said that they will never do another program like they did with the 87.
 
Guess they shouldn't have disolved Boeing Commercial Electronics, and all the in-house electrical expertise that went with it.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top